1 12 34 https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/68b1cbccc6c44ced106b959f97b60640.pdf 28432a89ade07190c2e0a9bb406311ee PDF Text Text PERSPECTIVES ON BIODIVERSITY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY "Development" Crop Diversity and Indigenous People in the Andes Indigenous farmers show over 3;000 varieties of seeds at a regional Hseed fair" in the Andes. by Tirso Gonzales T he northern countries have recently become concerned with losses in biodiversit)'· Among other things. this has included concern for the loss of native crop seed diversity. private industry in the North, if not for the fam1ers and Indigenous people of the ' Third World: Presently, Northern and Southern governments. U':lnsnational corpora· The main causes of this loss a.re external tions. and international developrnent to Indigenous populations, who have always considered the seeds of native plants part of their survi""l strategy and diet. These plants. which are described by scholars in the North as "under· exploited tropical plants with p romising economic value" or the "lost crops of the Incas," have through the growth of biotechnology industries been com·en· ed into a promising source of profi1s for and llnancial agencies link biodiversity in an almost natural way to biotechnol· ogy. and ignore the Indigenous peoples who inhabit the majority of the planet's regions richest in biodiversity. This absence of real interest in lndigenous peoples is consistent with the dominant practices of "'development"' and as well as lhose of conservation. Development Institutions and the Loss of Biodiversity n~ Gonz_alt'$ is completing a dL~I'lalion on Indigenous Knowledge and Biadh'trsuy in IIJ< Unfortunately, t11e Global Str:uegy Puuvfan Andes and Mc.xic.o bt the department for Biodiversity (G$8), one of the most of Rural Sociology at rhc Unh'usily of inOucmial recem policy frameworks Wisconsin . relating 10 conservation or biological Vol. 8 No.4 diversity. continues within the s..··nne modemizmionist vein. The GS6 \vas prepared by the World Resources lnstitme. the World Conservation Union. and the UN Environment Program in const~tation with the UN Food and AgricultUre O rganization. and included the work of more than 500 individuals O\'tr three years. It was designed for adoption by scientists, politicians. and governmental and nongovernmental organizations in both lhe Nonh and South. After three years of debate. only four of its 85 actions emphasize the role of Indigenous com· munities a.nd campcsinos in the protec· 11on of biodiversity. Many international agricultural insti· tutions also continue in the same mod· cmizationist tendency. T examples wo with panicular impact on Indigenous agriculture are the International Centers 21 �f'ERSPECTIV~S ON B IODIVERSI TY AND I NTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for Corn and \\'heat in Mexico. and the Jntcmalional Center for PotalO Research in Pen1. The so-called Green Re\•olution , associated with 18 such nuemational centers of agricltltural research and The culture or each and every one or these peoples -that is, the way they know things, their modes of being. and their modes or understanding the world MOUI'Id them-is shown in their rehuion backed by imemational de,·elopmem and Onance organizations like the \Vorld to crops. plants and other li'ong beings. Bank, the IMF and US AID. promoted a fom1 of agriculture very different from that of Indigenous campcsinos. The "'re\'Oiution" W;)S designed to use high inputs or chemicals and heavy machin· ery. and offers little of substance to Indigenous farn>ers. To the contrary, it An Alternative Project For the last two years, the Asociacion Bartolome Aripaylla (ABA), one of more than 20 groups associated with the Lima-based NGO Andean Project for Campesino Technologies (PRATEC). has btcn working to revive traditional has tried to transfonn them into modem Andean techniques and crops in the ramters. dependent not only on seeds Quechua comm\mity of Quispillacta, but also knowledge, tools. money and A)r acucho. The community's territory food. The. green revolution is a principal includes over 20.000 hectares of which cause of the loss of cultural and biologi- less than five percent have been brought cal diversity in the countryside. under cultivation . Uke man}' Andean Chemicals used in the "revolution.. ha\'e communities. Quispillacta is organized also COntributed tO contamination or air, at three levels: the Ayllu. the neighborwater. soils :.tnd living things in general. hood. and the community. Nuclear fam· ilies are brought together in the Ayllu Diversity in the Andes and strengthened through collective The Andes form a mountain chain work and ritual fiestas. The ABA is made that crosses territorie-s no\v known as up of community member$ who left to Colombi~. Ecu~dor, Peru and Bolivia. study in the city and fonncd an NGO The great diversity of Andean cultures there. This has converted them, as they developed close connections wilh the thetnselves recognize. into "'visitors" in eanh, the Pachamama. and the rest or the community. They had stopped fannthe living beings such as hills, water. ing their own plots for over thin.een animals. sun and moon. This regionS years, and depended on the city. After extraordinary abundance of crops. med- rcnecting on this problem . the members icinal plams. rnait lrees. animals and of the ABA decided to return to the commicro-organisms has eamed it designa- munity. "Correcting our errors. we tried tion as a. global ..meg:Hiiversi\y'"' center. to intensify our actions of strengthening As several scholars have noted. this the community. \Ve formed another diversity in itself is not so notable as the group in the communhy. grew plants manner in which it has occurred. The and worked in the fields like the other questions are: Why is there such high members of the Ayllus, and became pan biological diversity in the Andes? Who of the agricultural cycle of the commucreates. reproduces and cares for biodi· nity.'" vcrshy? How is 1his done? \Vhy is it The ABA works in the collection and done? inventory of local and regional seeds. The answer to these questions is communal and group planting. found in the imernction between the exchange of experiences. infonnation Quechuas, Aymams. Jibaros. :1nd seeds, and Andean pra.ctices for Chichimccas, Chinantecos. Chontal. exchanging and maimaining seeds. Aushiri, Quichua. Shuar. liuitotos. Aher these two years of work and Chichas, dozens of other Indigenous Sludy of genetic conscnrntion and ero· peoples. and the namral environment. sion. the enormO\lS differences between 22 the western and the Indigenous vision have become C\•idem. They have denominated these as "'the culture or hybrid seeds"' and the "culture of native seeds.· ABA held "Seed Fairs" in 1991 and 1993. These fairs have 1>rovided incen- tives to cullivate tlative seeds of many varieties, in comra.c;t to agricultur7tl fairs organized by the Ministry of Agriculture which promote "improved seeds: Among the objectives of the II Exposition of Andean Seeds were: to show the potential of native seeds that are raised in Quipillacta, to e..xchange seeds and knowledge. to demonstr.ue the role of subsistence fanners and increase phytogenctic variety, to promote and amplify the growth or diverse Andean seeds. and to show the. nutri· tiona! richness and the diversit)' of dish- es that can be made from Andean crops. Nearly half of the area's t\yllus partic- ipated in the second seed fair, presen,ing over 3.000 samples of twelve Andean crops. When crop diversity wns charted by region. it became evident that the greatest crop diversity was found in the Rio Papas watershed-especially in the areas of Pirhuamarca and Llaqtahuaran-whcre the development institutions have the least presence. This confinns-according to ABA-that crop diversity is greatly affected by projects that promote seed improvcmem. since they carry with them an established technological packet which tends tO dis- place the t'lative ecotypes and knowledge. Cases such as th" of the Asociacion Bartolome ;lripaylla sug,~est that the con- servation of seed diversity depends more than any~.hing on the conservation and strengthening of Andean cultures. Tnoe development in the Andes will never come. in the form of modernization. par· ticularly when this means--.s often stated in the past-the replacing of everything lndiar• with - modern," 'Western tech ~ niques. Rather, Indigenous agriculture will pia}' a critical role in any authentic process of Andean development. Abya Yala News � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource "Development" Crop Diversity and Indigenous People in the Andes Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Tirso Gonzales Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title "Development" Crop Diversity and Indigenous People in the Andes Item Type Journal Article Author Tirso Gonzales Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 21-22 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note There is emerging global concern for the loss of native crop seed diversity. Unfortunately, current efforts by prominent international organizations like the UN and World Bank ignore the role of Indigenous communities and campesinos in the protection of biodiversity. Attachment Title Development_crop_diversity.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Andes Asociacion Bartolome Aripaylla Biodiversity Conservationism Global Strategy for Biodiversity (GSB) https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/f547c36664a2b81bb6b206fb3fd68a7e.pdf 09f95fdb565f48d7915b6b9556de2d5a PDF Text Text PERSPECTIVES ON BIODIVERSI TY AND I NTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Amazonian Peoples on Biodiversity and ·tPR Resolutions from the Coordinating Body of Indigenous Communities of the Amazon Basin's Regional Meeting September. 1994, Santo Cruz de Io Sierra. Bo/Mo he Coordinating Body of Indigenous Peoples of the Amazon Basin, repre.seming Indigenous c01nmunities in this region, T which is one of the richest in biodivcrsi 4 ty in the world. will not be excluded from m:aking itS voice hc~trd in respect to this subject. In this regard. the Indigenous com· munities are well aware of the impor· t..'lnce of protecting biodiversity, as well as our knowledge related to it. \Ve know that our 3utonomy and assurance of life with dignity ,,,.m deJ>end on the process· es of comro l. consen•ation and develop· mcm of these resources especially over the next few ye.'\rs. when the world will be discussing the issues of biodiversity. \ Vc must be quite dear that we, 1he Indigenous communities. are the ones entitled to claim proprietary rights to tht..se resources. in spite of increasing claims made by multinational corpora· tions of the Non.h. This situation obliges indigenous people and our organizations to take positions and elaborate strategies rclc· vam to current and future generations. With thJs in mind. COlO \. under the auspices of the UN Dc\'clopmem Program. organized a regional meeting in South America. The conclusions and recommendations of that metting are reprinted below. I. Basic Points Of Agreement 1. Emphasis is placed on the significance of the usc of intellectual propeny systems os a new formula for regulating North-South economic relations in i> \trsuit of colonialist interests.. 2. For Indigenous peoples. the imel- Vol 8 No.4 lcclltal propeny s}'Sicm means legitiJnation of the mis.'l.ppropriation of our peo· pies' knowledge and resources for commercial purposes. 3. All aspects of the issue of intelleat"'ll property (detenuin.'ltion of access tO nation· ~I resources. comrol of the knowledge or cultural heritage of peoples. control of the use of their resources :md regulation of the tenns of exploitation) are aspects of self. detem1ination. For Indigenous peoples, :lCCOrdingly. the ultimate decision on this issue is dependent on self--detenninc'ltion. Positions taken under a tniSiecship regime will be of a shon·teml nature. 4. Biodiversity :md a peoples knowledge arc concepts inherent in the ide."- of Indigenous tenitori:ility. Issues relating to :t<.'C\."'$5 10 t'e:SO\IrctS have to be viewed from this Standpoint. 5. Integral Indigenous territoriality. its recognition (or restormion) and its re<.-onsti· tution. arc prerequisites for enabling the cre:uivc and inven~h'c genius of each Indigenous people tO flourish-and for it to be meaningful to speak of proteaing such peoples. The protection, rcconstlu.uion and development of Indigenous knowledge sy.st~ms call for f~,tnher com.milmerll 1 the 0 effort to have these syStems reappraised by the outside world. 6. Biodi,·ersity and the culture and lmel· leaual property of • people are conctpts that mean Indigenous territoriality. Issues relating to access tO resources. and othe- s. r ha"c to be viewed from lhis standpo~nt. 7. For members of Indigenous peoples. knowledge and dctemlin.1tion or the use of resoun::cs are collective and intergtnera· tior No fndigenous J)OP\Iialion. whether 1.1l. of indhiduals or communities. nor the govemmem. can sell or transfer ownership of resources which are the propeny of the people 3J>d which each generation has on obligation 10 safeguard for the next. 8. Prevailing intellectual propeny systems refle<:t a conception and pma.ice that is; o) colonialist, in th." the instruments of the developed coumries are imposed in order to appropriate the resources of Indigenous peoples; b) mcist. in that it belittles and minimizes the value or our knowledge systems; c) UStlllXItory, in that it is essentially a practice of theft. 9. AdjUSting Indigenous systems to the pre,-ailing ime\lectu.'ll propeny systems (as a world-wide concept and practice) changes the Indigenous reguL1tory systems them· selves. 10. Pot<nts •nd Other intclloxtual propeny rights to fonns of life are wucccptable to Indigenous peoples. 11. It is imponant to prevent conflicts that may ~rise between communities from the transformation of intelleaual property into a means of di\'iding Indigenous unity. 12. There arc some fonnuL-.s that could be used to enh.·mce the value of our prod· uas (brand names, appellations o£ origin), but on the undersro.nding that these are only IY tarkcting possibilities. not entailing monopolies of the product or of ooU ectivc knowledge. There are also some proposals for modifying prevailing imellectual property systems. such as the usc of cenificates of origin. to prevent use of our resources \vith· out our prior consent. 13. \ Ve mUSt prevent the use of current systcnts of intellectual propeny from rot>bing us. through monopoly rights. of resources and knowledge in order to enrich these >)'stems and build up power opposed toou.r own. 14. Work rm~ be conduaed Ol'l the 17 �PERSPECTIVES ON BIODIVERSITY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY design of a protoction and recognition sys· tern whic-h is in accordance with the defense: of our own CO!lception. and mechani.srns mu.st be developed in the shon and medium ICI'JT\ tO prevent appropriation of our t-e:so<trttS ond knowledge. 15. A system of protection ond nlC<>gni· tion or our resources and knowledge rnUSt be designed which is in confonn.ty with our i world view and contains fomlulas that, in the shon and medh.\m tenn, ,...,ilJ pre\'ent the appropriation or our resoUrttS by the countries of the Nonh ond Others. 16. There mliSl be appropri.'le mechanisms for maintaining and ensuring the right of Indigenous peoples to deny indiscriminate access to the resources of our communities or peoples. and making it possibte to contest patents or ocher exclusive rights to what is essentially Indigenous... 17. Dise\tSSions regording intellectual propeny should take place without distract· ing us from priorities such as the struggle for the right to tenitories and self-detennilu~ tion. bearing in mind th.·u the Indigenous popuL·uiott :u"'d the land foml ru1 indivisible unity. II. Short-Term Recommendations J. Identify. analyze and systematically evaluate from the standpoint of the Indigenous world view difiere.Ol <:Omt» nems of the fom>al imelleetual propeny sys· tenlS. including mech..misms, instrumems · and forurns. among which we h.1ve: a) Intellectual propeny mochanisms Patents, Trademark. Authors' rights. Rights of de\'Ciopers or new plant vari· eties. Commercial secretS. lndusui:.ll design. ubels of origin. b) lmell«:tual propcny Instruments The Agreement on Trade-Related lmem.1lional Propeny RightS (TRIPS) of the General 1\greemem on Tariffs and Tr:lde (GA'Ii); The Convention. on Biodive~ty, " 'th special emphasiS on the following aspects: cm•ronmemal impact .1s.sessmems. subsidiary scieotiftc body, technological council, monitoring. nation.1..l studies and protocols, as well as on rightS or fam>ers and ex situ control of genn pl-lsm. which are nOt covered 18 w1der the Convention. c) lmell«:tml propeny forums O¢Hne mechanisms for oonsult.1.tion and exchange of infonntuion betv..·een Indigenous organizations and imemational forums such as the: Tn.-aty for Am..uoni..m Cooperation. Andean Pact. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. European Patents Corwenuon. United Nations Commission on SUSI~inable Developmem. Union for the. Protecdon of New Varieties or Plams. V..' rld o Intellectual Propeny Organization (WIPO). lnternatiOMl l-'lbor Organization (ILO). United Nations Commission on Human Rights. 2. E' "luate the possibilities offered by Lhe intemadonotl instruments embodying cuhuml. political. environmental Md other lightS that could be incorporated into a sui genelis le&~l framework for the prot«:tion of lndigcnotiS resou=s and knowledge. 3. DeHne the comem or consultations with such forums. 4. Define the feasibility of using some mechanisms of the prevailing imelleaual property systems. in relation 10 protection of biologicallgenetic resourocs and marketing of nlSO\>rttS. 5. Study the feasibility or alternative systenlS and mechanisms for protecting lndigenous interestS in our own resources and knowledge: sui gcnelis systems for protection of inu::Ueetu."ll propeny; inventors' cenificate. model kgisl-ltion on folklore; new deposit standards for material entering genn pl1.Sm lxmks: commissioner ror imellectu.~ propeny rights; tribunals; bi.lmcral and muhil.:neml contraCtS or oorwentions: m:neria)s transfer agn..""<:nlClliS; biological prospecting: defensive publianiOI'l cenific:ues of origin. 6 . Seek to m.'lke alternative s)'Slems operational " 'thin the shon tem1, by estab· lishing a minimal regulatory framework (for example bilateral comracts). 7. Systemattcally study. or e.\1xmd stud· ies already conducted or. the dynamics or Indigenous peoples. with emphasis on: basis for suscainability (territories. culn.u·e. economy); use or knowledge and r<SOUI"<X$ (col· lecth't ownership systems. community usc of resources): contmunit)'. l'tation.."tl. regional and intem..1tional o~ni.zation:ll bases. These make it possible to create mechanisms wilhin and outside Indigenous peoples cap:W!e of assigning the same value to Indigenous knowledge. ans and crafts as lO western science. 8 . Establish regional and local lnd1ge:rlous ~dvisory bodies on intellectual propcny :Uld biodive~ty " 1th functions involving legal a<h~<e . lllOtlitoring. productjon and disscn\il\.1tion of inJom'l:ation, ~'d production of m.:11erials. 9. 1demify natiorml imcUectual property organiza.tions. especially in areas of biod.i· ""II versit)t lO.ldentify and draw up a timel3ble of forums for discltSSion and exchange or infonnalion on imelleclual propeny ancVor biodiversity. Seek suppon for sending Indigenous dele&~tes to panicipate in such forums. An effon will be nude to obt:tin information wilh a viC\V tO the C\•entual establishment of an lnfomt.1tion, Training and Dissemination Center on Indigenous Propeny at1d Ethical Guides on contraCt ncg<Xiation and model contmclS. Ill. Medium-Term Strategies I. PLm. program. establish timetables and seek finatlCing for the establishment or an Indigenous program for the collective use and protection of biological resourttS and knowledge. This program \\111 be de\-eloped in phases acoording to geographic areas. 2. Plan, draw up timctab!es for and hold seminars and workshops at the com· munity, national and regionol levels on biodive~ty and prevailing imell«:tual propeny systems and altemati\'es. 3. Establish a pctmanem consuhalive mechanism Unkir~s community workers and Indigenous leadel'$. 3S well as :m infor~ matkm net,vork. 4. Train Indigenous leaders in aspectS or imellectual propeny and biodive~ty. 5. Draw 11p ~ Legal Protocol of Indigenous law on the use and community knowledge of biological resourttS. 6. Develop a strntero• for dissemination of this l.eg.1l Protocol at t.he nationol and in lC.m:uional levels. Abya Yala News � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Amazonian Peoples on Biodiversity and IPR Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Amazonian Peoples on Biodiversity and IPR Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 17-18 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note The Coordinating Body of Indigenous Communities of the Amazon Basin settled on several basic points of agreement regarding indigenous positions and strategies relevant to biodiversity and intellectual property rights issues at a regional meeting in Bolivia. Attachment Title Amazonian_peoples_on_biodiversity_and_ipr.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Biodiversity Coordinating Body of Indigenous Communities of the Amazon Basin Human Rights Intellectual Property Rights https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/5e58e9961adf556535c67d5e000224db.pdf 932f138051fafbc32ed49b38adc6b467 PDF Text Text ORGANIZATION - - --=- Coalition in Support of Indigenous Peoples and Their Environment Founded lndigenous organizations. Panicipants di.scussecl1he struggle for autonomy and self.detcnnination. how to create mech· anisms to assure respect for Indigenous he Coalition in Support of Amazonian Peoples and Their rights. and how to strengthen access to decision·making on Em·lronment opened an ofric:e in government T Washington DC in Nov. 1994 to Indigenous rights. The intent of the con· impro,·e communication and coordina· ference was to develop clear definitions of autonomy and self·detemlination. tion among US-based NGOs working with Amazonian peoples. The Coalition was born from an alliance between Indigenous peoples of the Amazon and groups and individuals concerned with the fu ture of the Amazon and its peo· pies. Coalition Members suppon Indigenous territorial rights and sustain~ nblc development ahemath·es. and share the belief that people are an integral pan or the ecosystem. The Coalition will hold an annu.~l Fomm !or NGOs to meet, receive guidance !rom Indigenous leaders of the Amazon. discuss current issues, and develop politic~l action su·atcgies. Topics at next years !omm (May I O-l2 1995 in Washington. DC) will include: Free trade and De\'elopmem, Intellectual Property Rights. the Timber Industry. At present the Coalition has three working groups: U.S. Policy and Hl.lntan Rights. Defense of Territories. and Financial Resources. It is helping to coordinate a number of cmnpaigns such as the Ecuador oil campaign. In an e!fon to promote communications among interested organizations. the Coalition: distributes a monthly Am~ort Update with news from Co..1lition members. F()r mor~ inj()rm,uion, p/(6$(. ccncac1: CoalitiOIJ Coordinmo,. Melina Sel\'Cl:Ston. 1$1/ I< St. N\V Suit< 10+1, 1\~ irtgton . DC 2()()()$. Te/;(202) 637-97 I8.jax;(202)63i· 9719. emaiJ: am«Z:om:ool@fgc.apc.oJi. Self-determination Seminar in Mexico T he Second Seminar on Sclf-determi· nation in Mexico held on Jan. 20·21 was organized b)1 the Colegio de Mexico under the direction of Rudol!o Stavenhagen and hosted by Oax.1can Vol. a No.4 American Indian Satellite Network Makes History or the first time. Native.owned and F public radio stations across the country have access to regular program· ming for and about Natjvc Americans. thanks to the new t\IROS (American Indian Radio on Satellite) network. Since Oct. 31. tl1is history-making ser· ,;ce has offered a daily one-hour feed or dramas. documentaries. litcrmure, self. help programs and heritage pieces, all related to Native Americans. The AIROS network, initially funded b)• the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, is developing and establishing what will eventually be a 2+ hour distribmion system of radio pro~ grnmming by, for and about Native Americans. The AIROS feed includes a storyudling series, interviews with various Native American personalities. historical specials and a multi-pan series on breaking the C)'cle of child abuse. as well as a ' 'ariety of other specials and series. Nalivt America Calli11g will premiere at the end of February as a daily. hour-long. live call-in talk show focus· AND COMMUNICAT I ON most of whom operate on inadequate funds; says Susan Braine, AI~OS Manager. "We're working closely with the tribal stations to detem1ine program~ ming needs and to address those needs through tl1e radio programs that AIROS is able to acquire. Our goal is to encour· age and facilitate their own production of these programs. This is their network. It will be as successful and relcvnm as they. the stations, collectively make it: Braine said. AIROS also has plans to acquire ponable uplinks in order to broadcast conferences. po'"'vows. and oLhcr cui· tur:d events from reservations. This would allow tribes to share limited resources while learning from each other. For more information on the t\IROS schedule. contaCt your local public or Native.owned rndio station. Stations interested in becoming affiliated with AIROS should contact Susan Braine at 402-472·0484. Internet for Native Peoples Conference ndigenous activists !rom throughout California gathered at U.C. llerkelcy on Nov. l9 to learn new techniques and I discuss the opportunities for network· ing and alliance building on the in!or· tnation highway. Marc Uecker led a workshop using the Mosaic program to explore the Internet. This prompted both ideas and concerns about using the lmernet as a tool for funhering the causes of Indigenous peoples world wide. 01scussion that followed pointed to the ing on currem issues a.nd topics affecting demand for a larger and more in·depth conference in the future. Man)' who Native Americans. attended questtoned the use of this tech· nology !or people living on resen'l!tions and other third-world conditions who radio is the sole telecommunicmiot\S might not ll.we access to telephone lines service. AIROS directors see the net- or even electricity. work as a first-step towM<I an ambitious Ifyou have acc:t:SS lo a computer and modem. goal: building and linking stations on you mighc be inten-..ste(l in the following liscs the 250 Indian reservations in the rdatcd to Indigenous issues: Indigenous United States. greatest challenge is Knowlt:dg(. NaJive Netin obtaining Native comcm programs. Jisturv@('OP'ndl.tdu, Chiclt;, ~·fujcr 1.. ·liSt· particularly from the Native stations, proc@lmrinet.gsc.ucsb.cd!f, Rata Net. t\IROSlinks most of the 25tribal sla· tions located in Native communities in 10 states, many on reservations where ·our 35 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource American Indian Satellite Network Makes History Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title American Indian Satellite Network Makes History Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 35 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note The American Indian Radio on Satellite (AIROS) is a new radio network in the United States that broadcasts content from Native-owned public radio stations across the country. Attachment Title American_indian_satellite_network.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] American Indian Radio on Satellite Native American Reservations radio https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/03b31eb63ef9e1c8d4ab0d4f5f10a67f.pdf 41917f6f35fe99fc1a6fc8cac60bfd3c PDF Text Text P ERSPECTIVES ON BIODIVERSITY AND I NT.,_LL EC_,_UA L_,__,,O PE,R_,_' -- - - - - - - - - - - E, , o, T"'= P R , _, TY Biodiversity, Community Integrity and t he Second Colonialist Wave He whare maikhi tu ki roto ki te tuwatawata. he tou no te rengatira: he whare maihi tu ki te wa kie te paenga. he kai na te ahi. An ancestral house standing inside the community is the sign of chiefliness: one standing in the open is food for fire. - Maori Proverb by A T P roha e areake M ead M the Maori proverb above indi- tes. an ancestral house. or any pe<:t of heritage which restS within its home community. holds in itself and brings lO its people numa- AroJta Tt Pm·wkc Mead is a Maori aclivi.st and works wi1h Taonga Umittd in Ac>tcoara, Nt."W Zealand. 6 respect and sovereignty. If the house or any other aspect of heritage. either tangible or intangible, is taken away from its community and from its context, it becomes at risk of destruction. "food for the lire."' And its people are confined to • destiny of mourning for the loss of a beloved and irreplaceable pan of their heritage. For Indigenous communities. the underlying meaning in this pro\·erb is that the life force of that heritage still exists regardless of the physico! circum- stances around it An ancestral house will always be part or the heritage or ilS own tribal community even if it now fomlS pan of a national or imemational museum collection. #Jya Yala News �PERSPECTIVES ON BIODIVERSITY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY An Indigenous plant. its extracts and seeds. will always be part of the heritage or the community, who have imerncted with it for so many generations that the plant has become j>art of the language of that community, its significance reafGrmed daily in (waiata) songs. (whakatauki) proverbs and (whaikorero) traditional greetings. The Second Wave of Colonization The first wave of colonization consisted of the forced misappropriation of Indigenous lands and resources. most often through ,·iolence, resulting in mass alienation of Indigenous peoples from their homelands and heritage. The denigration of Indigenous vah,tes and practices was sanctioned by religious and social beliefs that tribal peoples (non-Christi:ms) were savages and barbarians, and 1heir cuhurnl traditions "'heathen'" and evil. Settlers claimed that theft of Indigenous lands served the .. public good'" and that new technology promised more effective land usc. improved farming methods. and new crops. Time proved, however. lhat new farming technology kept being impro\'ed until most farmers could no longer afford it. New methods also brought soil erosion. pesticide pollution. and the final insult. ha'"ing to buy seeds which were prc,riously 53.\'Cd ftom the harvest. Where Mother Earth used to be the equalizer for those who used her resources to feed, clothe. shelter and heal themseh'es and others, technology has turned her imo a factory. The second wa\'C of colonization sets its sights on mis.'1pptopriating what little remains after the first wave. the "'intctl'\gibles" of Indigenous cultuteslndigenous knowledge of the environment. pre"entative and curative healing practices. and panicularly traditional uses of Indigenous plants (medicines. dyes. complimentary crops to name but a fcw).\Vhere the first wave of colonization was made possible by nonnalizing the violence against Indigenous peoples Vol. 8 No.4 as in the service of "the public good," the second wave is accommodated and encouraged through national and intcrn:nional legal instruments which allow st~ucs and privme companies to exercise-through legal and financial nonns and standards~xternal private and exclusive ownership of 1he tangible and imangible heritage of Indigenous communities. liS not at all coincidental that the jus1ification of this misappropriation is the s..1.me: "It's for humanit)'. for the public good ." Before. it was land acqui· s1tion. Now. it is acquisition of knowledge and resources. No matter how one · looks at it, the result is the s..u ne: outsiders forcing the concepts of commodification of resources and acquiring ownership of the ancestors· gifts-lands, resources and knowledge. Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights Governments as well as private companies are now clamoring to copyright and patem Indigenous an forms. medicinal plants. languages and even genetic materials. Signatory states to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the UN Conference on Environment & Developmem's Agenda 21 (1992) are now required to respect and take measures to protect the Intellectual Propcny Rights (IPR) of Indigenous peoples and local communities with respect to bio· logical diversity. Many States have inter· preted these international directives as justifying the redesign of their national IPR legislation to legalize State governance of community assets. but Indigenous peoples around the world view such measures as unnecessar)' intrusions into the integrity of their communities. h is neither logical nor practical that the best system for the protection of the cultural and intellectual property or Indigenous peoples resides with states or even with the international community. Protection can onty be designed and implemented by Indigenous commul1ities themselves in panncrship with individuals and organizations (local, national. regiomll and international) of their choosing on an informed consent basis. The body most c.•pable of respect· ing and enhancing the unique needs of an Indigenous community is one initiated. developed and staffed by the community itself. National and international instruments cannot possibly prepare communities for the challenges upon theit own stro.ctures of leadership and accountability. State instro.mcnts should focus on the activities and proccdtu·cs of companies, bm it is clear that many States would prefer to regulate the activities of communities. At a funda· mental level there is al.s o the problem of states. as well as the international comrnunity. assuming that they have a right to develop standards and legally binding instruments for assets which do not belong to them. New threats facing Indigenous Communities: A Case Study The attack on Indigenous communi~ tics is constant and significant. Indigenous communities cannot afford to ignore external pressure and simply to hope that ignoring the threats will in time make them go aw-a)~ A brief examination of the national activities and c.xpericnces of the Indigenous communities living in just 01'e UN member State-New Zealand-demonstrates the diversity of IPR issues facing Indigenous communities. The human genome contains the heritage not just of an individual but of that person's community. for many Indigenous peoples. the concept of "'ownership"' of a human gene e\'en by the individual is just not accepted. The ownership of a human gene by a company is therefore reprehensible. \ Vithin the Pacific. two attempts have already been made to patent Indigenous human genetic material (Solomon Islands and the Hagahai or Papua New Guinea). The Human Genome Diversity Project has targeted over 200 South PaciGc Indigenous communities for genetic 7 �PERSPECTIVES ON BIODIVERSITY AND INTELLECTU~~ P R O P E~ TY ------------A L....!'-!~::!:.! R~~ sampling. Maori arc one of the few not on che lise (See arcicle on HGD Projccc pg. 13, eds.). However. che a11cmpced recommendation to the New Zealand government by Maori-that New Zealand discuss with other Pacific nations the itnplications of the collection of human genetic materials in the Pacific-fell on deaf cars. Research within New Zealand on cancer. alcoholism and otitis media (gl\lc car) has been reponed to focus on Maori genetic predispositions lO such conditions. In the hands of health insurance companies. genetic screening on the basis of ethnicity involves fundamental human rights issues which have yet to be c., plored. Copyright of Indigenous Languages In November 1994. che Oxford University Press attempted to secure an cxcl\lsivc copyright or che \Vi/limns Maori Umguagc Dicrionary. First pub· lished in l$44. the dictiOI''I:U)' remains the most authorilative dictionary of the Maori language. ll has been reprinted twelve times (seven editions) by the New Zealand Go'"ernmcnt Print Office, an agency established to promote the recording and publishing of New Ze3land hiscory for the benefit of all New Ze~landers. Many of che first Maori language and ~...laori history publications were financed and p11blished by a state- owned Printing Office on the underscanding that such publications were "held in trust~ as vital components of the national herilage. Prh'3tization of state agencies, including the Print Office. has opened 11p Maori publicatior\S to copyright by the privace sector. There are currently no mechanisms by which Maori can regain ownership. We will have to fight for each publication individually. Traditional Uses of Indigenous Flora and Fauna Several New Zealand companies 8 have developed successful cosmetic products using tradicional knowledge of nora and fa\llla. A ncdging phannaccucical induscry is also being developed. but at this point the cos1nctic propcnics of native plants are the primary ulrget of commercial exploitation. ln some cases the traditional knowledge comes from Indigenous informants. in other cases through research in historical records kept by early senlers-includingchosc of Capcain james Cook himself-which provide detailed and illustrated accounts of the properties and uses of native plants. The Body Shop recently negotiated with a small tribal company their extraction process for the oil of the native Manulla plant. Manuka is a native plant common to most of the North Island and of significance 10 many different tribes. such that songs, proverbs, weavings and other art fonns record the plant's special relationship to each tribe. Thus. from a tribal point of view. it is diffic\llt to accepc the validity of any IPR agreement bet ween two companies involving what most Maori would consider "common propcny."' Exploitation itself is easier to understand than the attempt to patent the process. or tO seck plant variety rights on the Manuk..1. Already. plant variety rights have been granted to national and international companies for thincen plants by the New Zealand government. In response, the Maori have filed a Treaty of \.Yaitangi Tribunal Claim against the go'"erntnent . seeking confirmation that all native plams are the heritage of Maori tribes in the first place. and that any decisions relating to the conmlercialization of native plants must by made by Maori tribes themselves. This historical case is due for consideration in mid-1995. Capacity Building: More Questions Than Answers The righcco intellectual property. as a western legal invention. was never designed co cope with the myriad ·properties"" now being thrust upon it. Indigenous knowledge and Indigenous resources simply do not fit into che IPR regime. Protection of heritage must be addressed through alternative mechanisms. but it must be a mechanism robust enough to apply to the diverse range of activities now thremening the heritage and livelihoods of Indigenous communities. Indigenous communities need to son out amongst themselves-without the interference of non·members-the tribal. sub-tribal and ramily "ownership.. of knowledge. \ \That is common property? Who has the right to give consent? Elders or youth? Tribal political structures or new additional specialiSt tribal organizations? \Vhat structures will they put in place? Should regional and national scruccures also be established? By whom? Indigenous communities should also make greater use of the infonnation highwa)' and strengthen national, regional and international networks in order to exchange information. offer advice and experience. and keep informed of the growing swell of che second wave of colonization - misappropriation of Indigenous knowledge and biodiversity. The most appropriate and resultsoriented contribution that states and the imernational community could offer is to provide additional financing for com· munity capacity-building. and to focus regulatory attention on external compa· nics. agencies, and individuals. As the Maori proverb scates. the heritage of Indigenous communities rests with those communities. If any aspect of this heritage is removed, it becomes food for the fire. Similarity. the proverb reminds us that che incegrity of a commul'lity requires us to hold firm and protect the treasures of the ancestors. If pans of our heritage have been lost. it is our responsibility to get them back. no matter how long il takes. Abya Yala News � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Biodiversity, Community Integrity and the Second Colonialist Wave Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Aroha Te Pareake Mead Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Biodiversity, Community Integrity and the Second Colonialist Wave Item Type Journal Article Author Aroha Te Pareake Mead Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 6-8 Publication Title SAIIC Newsletter ISSN 1071-3182 Date 1994 Language English Abstract Note Indian communities are now faced with the task of defending their cultural and intellectual property rights in the areas of agriculture, language, genetics, etc. Attachment Title Biodiversity_community_integrity.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Colonialism Copyright Intellectual Property Rights https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/bab8de122f9edd86e39e825c728d8830.pdf c86aa64d29042270741acd46c96a7517 PDF Text Text HUM A N R I GHTS Brazil: Crimes Against Indians Go Unpunished Celestino (who had been removed from office owing 10 his lies \\O local land· ih lords) was taking photographs o f houses and people in the area on behalf of a landlord who claims to own the land. Immediately after this event. a ta..xi arrived coming from the d irection of Palmeras dos Indios. It was driven by Assassination of Guarani Luiz Ferreira da Silva and the passenger Leader Marcial de Souza Luis Quijeiro shot from inside the car at Tupa-i One of 13razils best-known Indian the chief and those who tried to help leaders. the Guarani activist Marcial de him. For another hall hour. they continSouza Tupa·i was murdered in 1982. ued to shoot and insult the commu nity Ubcro Monteiro. a powerful landowner in an auempt to Stan a larger confrontaand leader of the rightist URD party is tion. The accused men admiued comwidely known lo have ordered the ass.\5· mitting the murder on Nov. 17, bm sination. i\t his trial in Mnto Grosso du claimed to be acting in self-defense. Sol. in March of 1993, over 300 civil. The murder stems from auempts by federal and military police were required the Xukuru-Kariri to recover their lands. 10 protect the proceedings. Throughout In August, Luzanel Ricardo had panici· the trial. Monteiro d isplayed an arro- p·ued in the occupation o£ two famlS .. gance suggesting that he knew he would located within the traditional tcrriwry or be acquilled. Maucir Pauleui, legal advi· the Xukum -Kariri. local farmers have sor 10 CIMI (the lndianisl Missionary been spreading a campaign to defame Council), • the trial was full of irregular· the victims. The atmosphere in Palmciro hies and negligence. It was a festival of dos l'ndios is one very tense. and in dis:,ppcarances of evidence essential for view or the threats made against the convicting the guilty. .. Montiero was, in Indian leaders. the surviving ,...i tnesses of this crime are in danger. Government ract, acquitted. Officials h3\1e re[used lO p rO\dde proteC· tion either lor the community as a whole Xukuru-Kariri Chief Murdered The likuna Massacre AI dusk on Nov. 14. 1994, Luzancl or of the witnesses. The "Massacre of lgarape Cap.1ce1e" is another example how Brazilian jUS· Ricardo da Silva. the Chief of the rs ticc works when the victims are Indians Xuku ru·Kariri community at Fazenda Ptoosc write lcu< demanding protcttion for Canto was b rutally murdered by a group Indian communiti($ b(ing thn;atcned, and an or common people. Seven years ago. fo urteen Tikuna Indians were murdered of armed men who had entered the immtdiact ,md fair imttStigarion of tlttst: r in the community of San Leopoldo in Indian Area. Acco- ding tO witnesses. crime$ to: the state of Amazonas. Their massacre alter shooting the chief through the was organized by a logger named neck. the murderers subjected him to Arrorney General of rhe Republic: Castelo Bmnco who at the time was liv- three further shots and various kicks Dr: Arisridt$ jtmqutira Afw1rt~1ga. ing illegally on their bnds. Branco con- and blows. Two other Indians were also Minlsre'rio PUblico Federal, SCAS Q 603. i tinues 10 Ji,.e in liberty less than J 5 wounded in the inc-dent. The incident lore 2J. 70200-901 Brasilia DF. miles from the Tikuna community in the occurred less than an hour after a dis· Fax: 0055 61 313-5197 city of San Antonio do lea. His tweh>c agreement had taken place between the alleged accomplices also remain free due members of the Indian community and hifomu.ulon f rom Portantin and CIMI to a writ of Habeas Cotpus.The trial for former chief Manocl Celestino. Qndiar1ist Missionary <Atmcil). he killings and massacres orr Indigenous people in Brazil, which continue with impunity. C Oitfirm that it is not enough to replace judges. or make the democnuic system more transparent-both of which are nccess.~ry changes. R mher, the problem lies in the nmure of the Brazilian Slate. which is controlled by and for the rich. The acquhtal of ex-president Fernando Collor by the Supreme Federal Tribunal-in addition 10 causing indigna· tion throughout the country- has sho" "' that Brazilian juStice is a juslice based on class. Cases such as that of Manuel Lucendo da Silva show how BrazilS jus· tice system works. Manuel lucindo. a contractor for rubber tapping. com~ manded the 1963 massacre of O ro-\\1n Indians in the Southern region of Rondonia. He was finally convicted, over thiny years later. in May of 1994. He was sen1enced 1o 15 years in jail, but remained a1 liben y until his appeal could be heard. l-Ie died before this ever took place. Ironically. this was the first conviction ever in Bmilian history for the crime o f genocide. T this crime has been poSiponed repeated· ly due 10 imemtinable confusion over which branch of justice has jurisdiction. Finally a trial date was set lor Dec. 12, but was postponed once again just one week before that date. or V 8 No. 4 ol 33 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Brazil: Crimes Against Indians Go Unpunished Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Brazil: Crimes Against Indians Go Unpunished Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 33 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note The Brazilian government continues to ignore crimes against indigenous peoples. Attachment Title Brazil_crimes_against_indians_go_unpunished.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Brazil Genocide Guarani Massacre Tikuna Xukuru-Kariri https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/df8f88ea081db569e7e598e2e3a0600b.pdf 173f8a0b5ce57e7f66f3340924f71e19 PDF Text Text I N B R I E F_ _ ,_,_ Indian Communities Trapped by Ecuador-Peru Border Conflict ighting erupted between the Peruvian and Ecuadorian armies in a disputed Amazon border region ~long the Ccnepa Rh·er valley on jan. 26. What looked at first like an isolated border skirmish has escalated into an intense conOict F At a press conference concluding their visit. the commission announced that the govemment could St<tnd in \'io1ation of the right to life and well·being as a result of oil pollution in the Amazon. t\ final repon on the visit has yet to be released. For more info,.matwn. coruacr: with at leasl 47 dead and 94 wounded combatants. The Sierra Qub l..tgal Dtj01S< Fund. /80 Montgomery St.. Suire HOO. S<ln Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (CONAIE) demanded a cease fire on Jan. 3 1. stating that. "'more than 300 communities a.re located in the zone of mili· FranclS<o, CA 9410-1, (415) 627·6700. FGX: (-liS) 62i·6i40, email: scldjsj@igc.copc.org. tary connic.t, these Indigenous cornmunilies that have nol Peruvian Indian Communities File Suit Against Texaco n December 29. a class action la,vsuit \I/3S filed in feder- been auended by either the government of Peru or of Ecuador". An unknown number of Indian residents of the region have been displaced from their communities. despite calls by CONAIE for the governments to respect the lives and territo· ry of Indigenous peoples. The war is reportedly costing each side overS 10 million a day. and has heated up with bombings on each side of the border and the downing of several Peruvian planes and a helicopter. Ecuador accepted a CCtlSC· fire mediation offer from former US president Jimmy C:mer and former COSta Rica president Oscar Arias. but Pcno declined to comment on the offer. OAS Commission Investigates Ecuadorian Human Rights Violations or yem'S. Indigenous organizations in the Ecuadorian Fmassive oilh•we suffered hum-an rightsb}'violations asmultina· Amazon a resuh or dC\'Cloptnem carried US-based OUl tiona! corporations and the Ecuadorian government within their territories. The struggle to resolve these problems hit a turning point on Nov. 7 when the Org...'\nit3tion of American Sunes· spe(:ial commission on hun'la.n rights arrh•ed in Ecuador to investigate human rights abuses in that country. Although the commission framed its visit as a general investigation of the human rights situation in Ecuador. the impact of oil development on Indigenous peoples was one of O al coun in New York on behalf of 20.000 Indigenous people !hong on and around the Napo River in the nonheast Peruvian Amazon. The suit charges that mismanaged Texaco activities within Ecuador, along the upper ~ches or the Napo River, caused severe damage to the lnditms' w3y of life in Peru- damage due to the release of huge amoums of toxic chemicals. and to repeated oil spills. This case follows a ground-breaking victory by Ecuadorian Indian organizations in the spring of 1994, when a New York coun held that Texaco could be held liable in US couns for their actions in Ecuador. The Peruvian suit charges Lhat ··texaco deliberately ignored reasonable and S<lfe practices and treated the pristine Amazon roin forest ... :md its people as a toxic waste dump... lt runhcr contends that over 400 flawed well sites were built. despite Texaco's full knowledge that they would ·rcsuh in SC\'Cre spills and environmental damages. The Ecuadorian governmem estimates that Texaco spilled 16.8 million gallotlS of crude oil and oil residues in its Amazonian provinces. with an unknov.m portion winding up downriver in Peru. As recently as J992. the Peruvian Rio Napo ran black with crude that had been released upstream . Irifonnati(}l1 I'YOYid<d by Edwatd f-lmnmcml.. two topics the Commission actually in\'cstigated (the other bemg the treatment of prisoners) . Half of the Commissions delegation traveled to the Oriente region. where they met with representatives from grassroots organizations and leaders or Lhe eoran and Siona·Secora tthnic groups. Commission members were appalled at Lhe impact of Texaco oil develop· ment on the envir onment. The Commission also mt:l with a Huaorani community from the Napo region who reponed on .J>ollution and the encroachment of colonists in their territory. In addition to meeting with state authorities, the Commission consulted environmental. human rights, and Indigenous organizations. including representatives from: CONAl E. CONFENIAE. COICA. ECUARUNARI, FICI, FOIN, and OINt\E. 4 Brazilian Senate Proposes Law Threatening Land Demarcation he Brazilian Stn..1te 3pproved a bill 3imed at eventually reducing existing 1ndian Areas within frontier zones. nnd T complicating the process of rmure demarcations. 10 become law. this bill will have to be approved by the Chamber of Deputies and the President of Lhe Republic. If approved. the btl! will put the already demarcated Yanomami Indian Area. located along the Venezuelan border, at risk of being reduced. The bill threatens not only the Yanomami. but would be a blow to all Indian peoples in Brazil. It is supported by CCO· nomic groups with a \'CSted intcr~t in exploiting the natural resources within the Indian Areas. as wen as cenain sectors or Abya Ya~ News �11'4 the mllillU)' who onsist th~t lndoan l•nds 111 the frontier zone thr-e:ucn nntlon:al security and tht: rnnintc:nancc: of Brazthan sovereignty. Tho$ erron by the Senate is one more obstacle to the already slow process of dcm~rcating Indian lands in Bmzil. According to the bill. future denmaotions would "'quorc the appro,'lll or the N•uon:tl Cong=. Addition~! provi.soon.s would require the Prau:itnt 10 consult ''ith th~ govemnttm of tM state in whoch the Indian Area is proposed Th- rules would make the dtn\.1n::lllOn of lndoan lands an)Where extremely diflkuh. 1f not Im pos>tble. BR I E f Indian Lands in US and Canada Targeted tor Nuclear Dumping uclcnr wnste produced throughout the Untted Statts could soon end up in the lands of the Meadow l..1kc Cree 1~escrve in Canada$ Saskatchewan provmce. tr plans under conslder:"tuon b)' tnbal c-ounca1s. nuclt~tr pow.:r compames N and gov~mment agtncits come to frunion. this would be 1hc "·lst• finol >top tn • long chain or nuclelr production and storage houstd on. or adjaeenl to. lndum bnds. The US Dcp>nment of Encr;y ond • potcntlO.I waste r<etpt<nt. Atomic Energy of Canoda LTD. uc consodenng construction or !\ pennanent nuclear wnstc dump on the From CIMI (lndrnn1U M1.$Swtr.a1y Co11rK10. Meadow l.,ke Cree Reserve. The Mcodow Lake Tribal Council hns supponed thts proposal. In their current l!<:onom1c lnttimives Report. the Council tout$ the dump as More of the Same Under Paraguay's an economic boon for the tribes 8.000 members. "Democratic" Government In promoting nuclear waste as the cure for econom1c nd~gCnO<lS peoples in Paraguay h.wc yet tO reap the benefits or dcmocmcy. which was restored m 198<} ~rter more th.•n titre<: tlls. th< Counctl follows in th< foototcps of the Mescalero cl=dcs of mdllllry diCt3lotShtp. Utde N5 ch;lngcd for Paroguays Tnb•l Counctl m New Mextc:o. whtch has olltred the hodlg<nous peoples smcc ~r:ll Allrcdo Su~r$ ovenhrow Mescalero r~r,~uon as 3 temporal)~ nucl.e3r sr:oragc snt m 1989.ln fact. rn>n)•orthecountlj~ lndogenousoommunhles In Feb. 1994. offictals of the Meadow L:tke Cree and the ""'" b«n fighnng mcrea.sed Jlr<SSUn'S to fore< them ollthetr C"..anadHm go,·cmment ,,sittd the Mesca1ero Reservalion. and arc reportedly working on an agreement \ltithin which lands. as wrll as go\'emment m.diiTr.rt:.lll'C to their needs. ' \\'e have tnle to our land. but 11 has been mvaded by more the Mescalero would act as temporal)' holder and broker or than 200 J>e:l.S."\l families. Our forest has been destroyed. our US nuclear waste-which would then be shipped on to Cree wild fnnt trees have been uprooted and tossed asldc without lands Mescalero Tribal Presodent Wendell Chino is cur· puy. the animals in the jungle ha,·c been ko off and we ate rently negotiating wuh thirty·t\VO utilities :md three lled going hungry." sud Nobeno Romero. nn elder m the Mby:l· nucle;ar comp;tmts for stornge of their waste, according to Gu.1rant communlt)t located m Ypa~ ln the S()Uthem depanment n Grccnpc3cc rcpresent3th..,. These pl>rlS may ha..-e been or c.-.-pa Dozens of surular confltru an: bang 0\-erlooked. or fordlalled b)' • tribal pltbtSCttc '" whtch Mcsc:dero mem· pla)ed doun, b)· President Carlos \\'osmosys g<>'-ernmcnt. bel'$ catcgonally rejec<ed propos:~ Is for nuclear '"llSSe stor· In 1Cl93. the lndig.."flous oommunlty m \'patl m.•naged to :tgc. The i'onh 1\mencan Free Tr>dc ,\grccmtnl (NAFTA) have SOlllt of tiS ttmtOij' dematattod :IS an lndtgt:nOUS resel''e has povcd the way for intcrnnuonnl shopptng or nuclear The COitlniUOil)' of Ypau \\':1$ gtven 2.600 hectares of natural wnstc. lrr.1di:tted fuel is a noi'Hnrl(f item wuhan the uadc fOt'dllS nnd swmnps 10 share with two other communities. However. 1hi~ has not put an end to the l:md mvasions which :lsrccmcnt. '""king it economic to ship nuclc:u 'vnste mto beg.1n In 1989. The mOst recent land uw:l$ion In \'pau beg;m this Cnnndf'l. The only requircmenl Is nccess «o temporary and paso Apnl, an official in the Mlni!.ll)' of Agncuhure and pwnnncnt stomge sites. For this. Indigenous l~nds have R.1nchmgs r..rm Credit Office Is reportedly • principal backer or been tnrgctcd, just as the)' h~ve •lways been for nuclear thiS tn\-;~S10n. Thn:e months >ftcr compe.stnos ~n invading te:sung. urnn1um mining and fuel enrichment. Tom Goldtooth of the lndtgcnous En,~ronmemal the Indigenous bnds- the )llS<tce ~hnlSil)' orde"'d politt to disNetwork char:teterizes th1s as ...a plot b)' government and lodge the tn\-.dets. Yet, no xuon l.,s bttn tokm The P.lrngu:ayan g«)\'t.mmcnl'~ pos:atton tn re.1:uion to tndU>tl)' to take ad,'llntagc of lndt3n trmtones: He adds. Indigenous commumties is charactonztd by a double standard. "'They know that wt don"t ha\'t: tnvn'Onmental codes or Parogua)• N5 one or the best l~ws 011 Indigenous rights in L:uin 1nfrnstructures that would protect us from stornge of w;\Ste. Amc!iCI. but pa)'S little aucmlon to ot. Instead. nccording to the Our network and our consutuems have been vchemcntl)' ln<hg<nous rights group ProfessioMI Soclo·Anthropologkal and opposed to 1hc federal stmtcg)' to site nuclear facilities on Legal Services. the government h:IS octunlly tried to p.1ralyze the our lands. It has to be stopped. If our d<•cted trib.1l orfi· dal$-<lnd some of them are puppets of the government-won't progr&.<S of Indigenous oommuniues nnd nllicd NGO~. stop it. our grassroots organizatiOns Will ... lttf~rmtttwn Jwm IAunan-.cnco Pr'ts.S, Uma. Ptru I \-Ill. 8 No. 4 s � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Brazilian Senate Proposes Law Threatening Land Demarcation Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Brazilian Senate Proposes Law Threatening Land Demarcation Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 4-5 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note The Brazilian Senate is considering legislation that would possibly reduce the size indigenous reservations. Attachment Title Brazilian_senate_proposes_law.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Brazil Legislation Reservations Yanomami https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/130e8818509ce403db20fc43c9a5f443.pdf 0d93b78b48271339a8b7f4d465e36047 PDF Text Text CHIAPA S Chiapas Update: Mexican Government Launches, Then H alts, Sudden Offensive the EZL'< and undcrstand thc =sons for their dectSion to tJke up arms as the only method 10 be h<'ard. From the hean of tht moum21n 1n Gurrr~ro we declare. <'You are nOt alont"• The lndig~nous org.'\niutions who r<ccnLI)• formed Orgl1nlztltion represem· formed the Counetl of Indigenous and ing the Indigenous :onrs of Chiapas. C.'mpesino Organt.tations of Chiap.1s warned in • press release on Feb. I I . (CEOIC} in February of 199'1, have "\Ve nrc sure th:t~ nil of u.s :tre on that list divided the states prcdomiMntl)• territory in whnt he terrned a .. poHce- and can C.'l(pt':Ct lObe nrrcsted soon." On Indigenous regions uno autonomous acuon" to nrrest the EZLN lendership. Feb. 13. the General Council described terrilories. now reJ>rcsentcd by an elecl· Nonetheless. Indigenous. non.govem· the government$ offensive ns a ..genoci· ed General Council of Plur.ethnic mcntol ond hun1on righiS organizotions dal war: r<ponang that five people had Autonomous 1\reM. On Feb. II. the throughout Ch~1pos, as well as members been killed In the communaty of La Council announced u would organa:e a of tht M\IOn.:ll mtdlatton commission Estrella. and th>l mony had been march from Chaapas 10 Mcxaco Cny to (CO:-IAI) hc3dtd by Bt<hop Samuel detamtd ond tonurcd by the anny in ·mob•liu a thot~S~nd lndagenous people Rmz. were also ••rgetcd by the go"ern· three lndagenous regions and an the from the autonomous regaons." and to menl OfftMl\'C. Thousands of &O''tm- communal)' of Ocosango. bnng aucnuon to the Chaapos conOact. tmnl troops occupacd communities nnd The Councd also Sl2tcd au; lntrnuon 10 set Ull roadblocks throughout the St>te. Offensive Halted conunue organtz:ms for \'lctOt)' m the seohng orr th< mcdaa, human nghlS In a sudden chonge of strategy. coming mun•CJpal and congrcssaonal worktrs, and the geneml populauon Zcdallo halted the mllhary offensave on elections an Chinll:lS. Although the cense-farc has been from chc zones of conflict. No major Feb. 11. and asked the national congress con01cts lx:tween the two ;lrmies have lO appro,•e a lnw gronting omneSt)' to temporarily re·cotablished In Chlnpas. been reponed, though one Mexican offi- members of the EZLN who surrender the state rcnmms cxtremel> tense. • cer was kallcd by sni1>er fore. their weapons. On the same day. the nal- Indigenous organiamlons reporc that \oVhcn announcing the offensive, ing party's governor of Chiapas, the so-coiled "while gunrds." paromili· Zcdallo ouempted to discredit the EZLN Eduordo Robledo Rmcon resigned from tary forces employed by Iorge by hnking le•dcrs to terrorist acts m the office m wh3t he called :m act of peace. landowners. have acted wuh increas· laiC 1960s. and dascloscd the leaders' Both the opposluon Pany of the ing \iolencc nnd nggrdSion through· alleged Identities Subcomandante Democmuc Rtvolulion (PRO) and the out the stole . The Gcncr.~l Couneal or M•reos was ldenufied os Rafael EZLN had detn(lndcd Robledo$ ~gna­ Pluritthnac A\ltonomous Areas m3d< $ebastljn Gullltn Vicente, a professor of uon following fraudulent tl<elions last the following call for help In thtar last commun1eauons from T2basco Slate Dettmber Ounng Robltdos mougurn- press rele3SC; Marcos tseJptd capturt when the army uon. PRO gubernotonal candtdate swcp1 amo the Z3p.111Sl3 capital of San Amado Mend3no fonncd a p.1mllel go,._ Und<r rhtS<: condutons, "t arr l<llling Pedro de Maeh<»Clln RtsadeniS of this emmcnt supported by many Indigenous out w rhe resr of rht ""dd ro !urn rhear eyes and 01hcr communities In Z:lp>lista ter- Orgl1niz.1110ns ~nd the E~LN. Avedafto toward Chlap<~s. IVt a•< In •teed of disuib· ritory ned I hear houses before the annys responded to Robledo's resignation by ulion of injomaallon 10 nmiontd and fnt<rasking PRO mllil~nts 10 surrender the narional sphcm; lmcrnatlonal obsen·ers; :trrL''ol. govcmmcnt buildings which they have letters to tht Mt>.iam .~ovcrnmcnt; firum· Generalized Repression occupied in the region. dal assistance; hucrnallnnol orgcmizing In launclung the offensive. the ami protests. p11rtlcularly In front of Mexican governmem dcclarul its imen- Indigenous Organizing: "You MeXican emb<lsslrs and cOil$t<I<Uts; 1md uon to arrest a list of over 2. 000 indl- are not alone" cara•·ans. IVt ore also <ISinngfor supp<1rt In vacluals p.utlclp;oling on the state$ social Over 1,000 Indigenous represent:l- rht ltgal rc«>smtlon of the aa.ronomous movemencs The offices of CON PAZ. the ti\'CS from throughout the country met regions. Our lncentlon ts to $11(11gth<n tht largest human nghlS organualion in in Guemro state from Ott. 16-18 to so/idoriry btt~<ctn all O!•P·~d ~<. an Cha•pos. wert lOOted by tht militol)' on form the ~•uonal lndagenous the midst of a crudal n101ncn1 in lht 5lrugCom'tnllon (CNI). The CNI declared, ~ for tht ltbtratwn of the lndrgenous pa>Feb 10. The General Council of Plunethnae Autonomous Areas. the · we takc >Sour own the 13 positions of ple of Chwpas. 0 n Pebruory 9. Me.xican Presidem Emesto Zcdillo broke the censc·flre in Chiopas. ordering n surprise ilwosion of Zapatista-held 32 Abya Yala News � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Chiapas Update: Mexican Government Launches, Then Halts, Sudden Offensive Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Chiapas Update: Mexican Government Launches, Then Halts, Sudden Offensive Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 32-33 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note The Mexican Government launched a recent, short-lived offensive in Zapatista-held territory in Chiapas. Attachment Title Chiapas_update.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Cease-fire Chiapas CONAI EZLN National Indigenous Convention (CNI) https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/cfb786cadb866a1e3b2a9b2187e47dc1.pdf af83d7af2adce2784107bce0c5479828 PDF Text Text ORGANIZATION - - --=- Coalition in Support of Indigenous Peoples and Their Environment Founded lndigenous organizations. Panicipants di.scussecl1he struggle for autonomy and self.detcnnination. how to create mech· anisms to assure respect for Indigenous he Coalition in Support of Amazonian Peoples and Their rights. and how to strengthen access to decision·making on Em·lronment opened an ofric:e in government T Washington DC in Nov. 1994 to Indigenous rights. The intent of the con· impro,·e communication and coordina· ference was to develop clear definitions of autonomy and self·detemlination. tion among US-based NGOs working with Amazonian peoples. The Coalition was born from an alliance between Indigenous peoples of the Amazon and groups and individuals concerned with the fu ture of the Amazon and its peo· pies. Coalition Members suppon Indigenous territorial rights and sustain~ nblc development ahemath·es. and share the belief that people are an integral pan or the ecosystem. The Coalition will hold an annu.~l Fomm !or NGOs to meet, receive guidance !rom Indigenous leaders of the Amazon. discuss current issues, and develop politic~l action su·atcgies. Topics at next years !omm (May I O-l2 1995 in Washington. DC) will include: Free trade and De\'elopmem, Intellectual Property Rights. the Timber Industry. At present the Coalition has three working groups: U.S. Policy and Hl.lntan Rights. Defense of Territories. and Financial Resources. It is helping to coordinate a number of cmnpaigns such as the Ecuador oil campaign. In an e!fon to promote communications among interested organizations. the Coalition: distributes a monthly Am~ort Update with news from Co..1lition members. F()r mor~ inj()rm,uion, p/(6$(. ccncac1: CoalitiOIJ Coordinmo,. Melina Sel\'Cl:Ston. 1$1/ I< St. N\V Suit< 10+1, 1\~ irtgton . DC 2()()()$. Te/;(202) 637-97 I8.jax;(202)63i· 9719. emaiJ: am«Z:om:ool@fgc.apc.oJi. Self-determination Seminar in Mexico T he Second Seminar on Sclf-determi· nation in Mexico held on Jan. 20·21 was organized b)1 the Colegio de Mexico under the direction of Rudol!o Stavenhagen and hosted by Oax.1can Vol. a No.4 American Indian Satellite Network Makes History or the first time. Native.owned and F public radio stations across the country have access to regular program· ming for and about Natjvc Americans. thanks to the new t\IROS (American Indian Radio on Satellite) network. Since Oct. 31. tl1is history-making ser· ,;ce has offered a daily one-hour feed or dramas. documentaries. litcrmure, self. help programs and heritage pieces, all related to Native Americans. The AIROS network, initially funded b)• the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, is developing and establishing what will eventually be a 2+ hour distribmion system of radio pro~ grnmming by, for and about Native Americans. The AIROS feed includes a storyudling series, interviews with various Native American personalities. historical specials and a multi-pan series on breaking the C)'cle of child abuse. as well as a ' 'ariety of other specials and series. Nalivt America Calli11g will premiere at the end of February as a daily. hour-long. live call-in talk show focus· AND COMMUNICAT I ON most of whom operate on inadequate funds; says Susan Braine, AI~OS Manager. "We're working closely with the tribal stations to detem1ine program~ ming needs and to address those needs through tl1e radio programs that AIROS is able to acquire. Our goal is to encour· age and facilitate their own production of these programs. This is their network. It will be as successful and relcvnm as they. the stations, collectively make it: Braine said. AIROS also has plans to acquire ponable uplinks in order to broadcast conferences. po'"'vows. and oLhcr cui· tur:d events from reservations. This would allow tribes to share limited resources while learning from each other. For more information on the t\IROS schedule. contaCt your local public or Native.owned rndio station. Stations interested in becoming affiliated with AIROS should contact Susan Braine at 402-472·0484. Internet for Native Peoples Conference ndigenous activists !rom throughout California gathered at U.C. llerkelcy on Nov. l9 to learn new techniques and I discuss the opportunities for network· ing and alliance building on the in!or· tnation highway. Marc Uecker led a workshop using the Mosaic program to explore the Internet. This prompted both ideas and concerns about using the lmernet as a tool for funhering the causes of Indigenous peoples world wide. 01scussion that followed pointed to the ing on currem issues a.nd topics affecting demand for a larger and more in·depth conference in the future. Man)' who Native Americans. attended questtoned the use of this tech· nology !or people living on resen'l!tions and other third-world conditions who radio is the sole telecommunicmiot\S might not ll.we access to telephone lines service. AIROS directors see the net- or even electricity. work as a first-step towM<I an ambitious Ifyou have acc:t:SS lo a computer and modem. goal: building and linking stations on you mighc be inten-..ste(l in the following liscs the 250 Indian reservations in the rdatcd to Indigenous issues: Indigenous United States. greatest challenge is Knowlt:dg(. NaJive Netin obtaining Native comcm programs. Jisturv@('OP'ndl.tdu, Chiclt;, ~·fujcr 1.. ·liSt· particularly from the Native stations, proc@lmrinet.gsc.ucsb.cd!f, Rata Net. t\IROSlinks most of the 25tribal sla· tions located in Native communities in 10 states, many on reservations where ·our 35 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Coalition in Support of Indigenous Peoples and Their Environment Founded Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Coalition in Support of Indigenous Peoples and Their Environment Founded Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 35 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note The Coalition in Support of Indigenous Peoples and Their Environment, made up of US-based NGOs in Washington, D.C. is established. Attachment Title Coalition_in_support_of_indigenous_peoples.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Amazon Coalition in Support of Indigenous Peoples and Their Environment Human Rights Reservations Washington D.C. https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/5a7c5463c9bd73f4605bf0d39ccec6d7.pdf af1392e16242952dd21b0491dc9beb8d PDF Text Text HUMAN --- - R IGHTS At on• a.m on Dtc. S. 3 group of from prosecuuoll) 111 Septtmber b)' masked. anned men forced thctr way Federal Justlet Avchna Mor:1les into Gernrdo Estrada~ house and Guzman of the thtrd distnct, forcibly abduct<d hom. Despnc all Ch1huohun. despite sixty-three out· ouempts to locate hom, his whereabouts Slnndmg fedeml and state indiCtments. remam unknown. Ills ~dls..'lppearnnce.. Documents obt:uned fro1n che auorney has been denounced tO the National : gcncrnl~ office and former National Human Rights OrnsbudsmnnS office lndigemst3 lnsmute employees indicate and to the Jn1Cr1or MllllSitr, and a writ that no less than thtrty SC\'en people or hnbtas corpus \W$ presented on hiS ha-"' been killed by Fontes' :ISSOCi:ltes behalf Gerardo Estrada IS a member of the O\'Cr the past three years. goverrung commlllCC Of the JndtgtnOUS Authontits of Colombl3 mo-·emem. and For """' lliformar""'- ( OfttCI(t· Randall Gir.gndl, ~<S< GIIGtdWil<, .)l<n'CI M<r<IJ< had n:eently been elected to the depanl'>ogram Dtr<aor ttl/FAX· (602}-.J26-2.511. mcm's mun10pal assembly In common \\1lh other lndtan c:ommumues.. the arnnl· ..U...."""g' op<.Otg lnd1ans 111 the rn.to regton >rt work1ng Nicaragua: Recontras 10 reco'·er th<tr trnduoonallands In the process, they ha"c come mto conflict Massacre Miskitu s t lci\St 20 Miskuu lnd1ans were ""th local landowners who. ""'h the kolled In Nov. when I00 recomru cooperation of military and p.1rnnnlilnry auacked the villages of Nucv:t Espcranza fon:;ts, have conumtted human ngl11s and Kant:tW$ 1n the area of S3n Andres violations again>t them. In Mny. the de Bocay. The O 'CCOntms mny be part or body of regional Indigenous leader, a group that broke awn)' from the Freme Laureano ln~mpue was found two dn)"S None 3-80. the l.bt recontm group to o.fier hos ,tbducuon by men who stated dls;tnn. that they wen: scm by the local military Anny Capt Milton S.1ndoval sa1d the commander recontms were mOSt hktl)' loolang for boots or food Sond0\'31 s:t1d se-·eral l'ltasc w-.41<11<'> .,.Jaxts .-.pl<>SI"S con.ccm hundred ann)' troops had been jo.-IN "'frtyojlr.d~ kod<rwrardD depiO)..,d. but could not reach the 31'<.0 &trodo ar.d "'8'"S ''"" <tfl po<stblc mcasurn beduse of l~ck or roods and heavy rains. be token to'""'"' IN It•<> of lttdlgtrt<JUS kadm In 1~ conrcxr of rtunr hi/lin~. 10: From: \\~tkly Net<'$ Up<lare on'"' Amaic.._ Senor Pn$ldtntt .Er'llt$1<1 S<Jmpu ""':ano, P":sldcntc de Ia Rtpubll<u. Palacio dt f'.'arlM. Colombia: Indigenous Leader Sanrofc de Bogota. Coloml>l<t. Fa.v: Oil 57 I 286 N311287 7939. Disappeared A rmed men abducted Indigenous .ll.Jeadcr Gemrdo Estrada from his Wuh <opla 1o: home 111 the 1\lquems municip.1lity Amh<l:lsad<>r Gabrltl Slh'd, Embcwy of Narino department on O.:c. :;_ His Colombia. 21181.£roy 1'1 NIV, 1\'cl,hlngrc>ll. whereabou<> ""' not known and there is DC 2000'1. and QNEP. M 2$916. Bogool. serious concern for h1s safety, <Speciall>• Co/Dmb!a. as lnd1genous leaders obducttd under similar on:umSt2ned: h,a,•c o£t.en bet:n an mddin1le ·:-unp.1ro· (c)r tmmunit)' Mexico: Sierra Madre Appeal he Consejo Asesor Slerm Madre (CASMAC) nnd Indigenous communiues throughout the Chihuahua T Mount~ms h:wc requested urgenl inte r- nauonal suppon to their demands for pc11CC and ;u.tlc.: 111 muluple assossinations •nd Other brut~l abuses of lndogcnOU5 Tornhum;trn, TeJXhuan. and tnv1ronmencal leaders in nonhem Mvnco\ Sterm Madr<. mountoon range_ In 2 kuer to Mtxtcan President EmrStO Zedtllo. CASMAC descnbes onc~d violenct 3g;>oi\SI Indigenous leaders ond env1ronmenU1hstS in the Slerm Madr<. of Chohunhua. Drug trafOckors working with local caciques (poliucal bo.~) nrc reponrdly responsible for many ossassinalions. beatings and other actS of violence Stme authorities have reportedly refused to investigate the maJOrity of these c~ and f«ieral mvesugouon~ have been hindered by dl\'trston of resources tO Other prio.rIU<S and by corrupuon in the judicial S)'S<cm Aecordmg to the feder.>l attorney scneml. one of the most ''IOiem CXI<JUCS. Anem1o Fontes. was granted 34 A lallcd. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Columbia: Indigenous Leader Disappeared Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Columbia: Indigenous Leader Disappeared Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 34 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note A group of armed men abducted one of Columbia's key indigenous leaders who helped to lead efforts to recover traditional indigenous lands in the Pasto region. Attachment Title Columbia_indigenous_leader_disappeared.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Gerardo Estrada Indigenous Authorities of Columbia land rights Pasto https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/9b24bf9174bd893cf7809f7bc1b58509.pdf bb6786f6683428215bd5ba78b333b1f1 PDF Text Text EDITOR I Al T he tmpact or ncolibtrahsm on Indigenous muons. oriY'n~:muons. and cultul'C$ or the t\merlcas Ius been severe. The 1\<formulauon of the world economy accordtng to the globolu.,uon of capnallus tr.msl:nl'd tnto btMfits for our commwnlld R.11her. 11 IS precisely thiS globahzouon that Ius <lurpenl'd our problems. fOrttgn ln\·estors COOl IOU(: lO VJC\\' L.-.tln Amr:nca 3S the piJte rrom which nches C'3n bt CXtt'3(1ed Ot where the fifb"t worid~ toxic \\'OtStt C3.n be dumped, often wnh lhe consem of the nnuont\1 govemments. P~n or lhls conunuing movcmem ror economic appropnauon as the mcre3Sing ::~uclnpts co collect ::tnd oommerciali2e lndtgcnous peOI>Ies· knowledge and hiodtverstt)' not been Tlus practice of scckmg to mine our mind.s-3nd even our bodies-is conunonly known as "bio· prospecting," and bnngs \\1th uthe threat or tremendous new misappropriation of lndtgcnous resources. To counter this intensifytng threat. Indigenous peoples· or~Y~nl:ations urgently need to dcvdop conunental Stmteg•c l'C$J)OtlSeS of mutual suppon based on our nch expenenreof reSistance to colonllll fon:es. t\ baste undersundmg of the processe< shaping Wt;tern forms of ownership and access co b.c>dl\'tiSit)' is an tmponam first Sl<p In this snuggle. Through thiS ISSUe of Abya Yala Sews, "'t hoP'" to pmtn(lle the exch.1nge of inlormauon •nd cxpencnces that chc silwlion dcnunds. \\~ WISh to <mphosl::<:. h"""'''<r. that secunng protection lor Indigenous knowledge and blologtatl resources is only p.1n of the $lruggle we ha,·c heen carrying out lor 500 )'cars. the struggle 10 secure self-determinauon. human ngltts nnd ttr· ntory. Until now. lndlgenou~ peoples' knowledge : d inno":u1ons h~we never been rccog1,i2:cd. buL n1ther m have been expropriated. wilh()ut compen.smion. along with land and resources. Current nntionttl and International iniuau\'es deahng \vtth '"rights'" to biodiven.ity arc v;tguc, are not being implemented, or are directly rounter·producttve. Appropriate consen-ouon of btodl\'trsity in lndtg<nous territories ~t the genetic. species ond CCOS)'S· tern ltYtl;., lund>lll<.nlJII to the Slll'\'i\-ol and development of our <O<Iettes. Yet. the globoh:=~uon or the morkct ond rrtt-tmck td<ology. coday often <quatl'd W1th d<rnOCf'.tcy and partidpauon. h:l'oe m the lase )'<OilS tn<:r<ased the commodlftc•tton •nd erosion or btodwc"'">' Businesses arc focustng on lndtgenous Jl'"Oples· tradtttonal homdonds becluse they are biologtc:olly nch areas. Ther are Sttn os reservotrs of scnccic resources lor the rood. >griculture and phannaceuucal lndUSirits. escalating pressures on the land, resources and cuhu""' of Indigenous sodetlts. Consequently. Indigenous peoples around the globe are ft~clng cnom10us pressures to cornmen:iollze their traditional resources and knowledge. We arc not. by any mc:ans. trying to encour:~gc lndtscnous communities 10 beconte pall of the so-c:~llcd free market, or to jom in the commercialization of Mother E.'nhs resoun:cs. If lndtgenous communities want to sell their resources or to get compcn5-'llon from the corporauons or other bochcs seeking aec.:ss to these. !her h3•'t the nght to do so. But we h:r.·e to remem· btr chat future generatk>fiS "ill ol>o depend on the land ond ecosySlerns to SUI'\'1\'t. much tnore tlt.1n on any money the S3k or th- re50urecs would brmg. We "1Sh to emphas1u: the nt<'d to continue fomlymg an lndtgenous moYematt whtch en,istons ·~If ot the contincnml and even the global level. We cannot afford to let the corpornuom. and nnuonal governments dhide Indigenous peoples and rommunhi"" from each other while they seek 10 plunder our resources. It is hni>C'mlh·c to (ace th1s latest assault with t1 e-omwnon ngrecmcm nnd a unified Str:IICg)' for survi,·nl in the. shon . medium and long-term. SAIIC Board or Directors ~8No.4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Editorial Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Editorial Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 3 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note Bioprospecting has become a tremendous threat to indigenous groups across the globe. Indigenous communities need to develop a common strategy for responding to these external encroachments. Attachment Title Editorial.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Biodiversity Bioprospecting Conservationism Globalization Latin America https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/a33ad888aea23c61a8201958f48f21b8.pdf f9a90267e85b2f68845cba85f4d72b86 PDF Text Text ORGANIZATION AND Expanding Indigenous Journalism in· Central America ndigenous leaders met in E1 S.1h'11dor from NO\'. 11 -13 for the second Centro! Amencan plnnnmg meeting for the lntcrn:lllon:ll Indigenous Decade. According 10 the I PS news service, represcntnuves focused on plans to boost lnd1an news mcdlo 1n the region. N1cnmguan l ndl~enous leader Mirna Cunnlngh.'\n po1 nted 10 • pilot project bemg camw OUI In N1camgua with md1o and the p~ wh1ch could be ben<flctnl for 1he d.-·elopment of lnd1genous med1a m Ccntml Amenca. She ln(ormrd IPS th.'ll the tr;umng of lndtgenous )oumahsts and professionals ·IS alread)' happemng m the regton. ah hough 01 modest levels." and added that the upgmdmg o( CXIStiOg programs is bcmg sought. ;\dnnn Esquino L1sco. head of the N•uonal Indigenous Association, stated that they were thinking of stnrtlng an lnd1 gcnous mdio station, although they lacked lnfomtatlon on the current situa· tlon R1goberta Menchu. who W:J.S also pr<S<nt at the m<eung, pledgtd the suppon of the Vicente Mcnchu Foundation m undcnnkmg a study of the oaual situotoon and needs of lnd1genous communmos In Guatemala, Hondur3S. N1caroguo Jnd the southern Mexican state of Ch1>p.1S. COMMUNICATION of trust "'sponslbiliues h tstoblished a Zunl on 1ssucs conct'ming n:uu~l resources. S1gnifl(llmly. the pbn uses Zuni religto\IS ond cuhuml valuos :J.S the b:J.Sis for decision-moktng. This approach to development has pro\•isions to provide Imming of Zunis already brought a 8"'"t deal of success to fall profes.~ional positions. the build- to the project and to Zuni. The project ing of gcogmph1c lnformauon systems. now cmploys60 lll:oplc. 59 of which are ond elabomtlon of n resource develop- Zuni. lmplernc.nuuion o( lhe pktn 1$ 1n its first yblr and watershed rehabilitament pion. Intellectual Property R~ghts is one of lion has already begun. Tmd1tional agothe pLOJ«ts prmctpal concerns. 2um are culture IS molong a comeback and trndl· in the process of deflmng for themselves uon>l technolog)' lor ci'0$1on control IS what Zum tmellectu>l proptny IS and being tncorpomt<d mto the rthabohta· what t)'pt of "pLOt<ctton" they would non \\rork. lnd1gcnous communuzes hkr to sec for thts proptrt)CTrodutoml tntemauon.tlly have shown amerest in seeds, for exnmple. need to be plotect· the ptOJCClS appro.1Ch to communuyed. but cnnnot be used-¢,-en by b:J.Sed development ZunlS-for commerdol purposes. $.1cred sues. religtous ani(:~cts. trodiuonal an Tribal Sovereignty: Back to the styles. l:mgungc. religtous ceremonies. Future? songs. and medicimd plants nre other his symposiUm on the rights ond status of Indigenous people was types Of "property" COnSidered for pro· tection . sponsored by 1he St. Thomas University. A related yet sepamte Issue is that its Hun10n Rights Institute, its law of cultural preservntlon. Many of school. and the Oklahoma Cuy Zunt5. tradhaons have endured the pas• Umverslty Notlve Amerlcon Legal 500 years. Zum contmue to pracuce Rcsoun:e Center. It took place m ~hami, rchgoous and cultuml tmdiuons that Flonda on Dec I and 2 The conference. ongmatcd thous.mds of years >go. The addressed issues or lod1311 culture and past 50 yc.• rs. howe\'tr. have brought sptritu>hty "" well M cbiOIS of tnlxtl about ropld chongcs In dcmograph1cs 50\'treignt)' and cnucal IS>Ues of fcdcral and hfestylt. The Conserv:mon project lndL1n law. ond was designed 10 Crt.lte a holds that much of I he do mage 10 Zuni launchmg pad for ongoing research and lands "'suhcd from the breaking of ana.lysos. Zuni Conservation Project traduional forms of land manngcmcnt. The conference fcaturcd • broad Pushes Sustainable and know~ that traditional methods array of subject m~ner ond expen Development are much more sustnlnnble, and strh·es speakers from Bmzll to Alnskn. Papers he Zuni Tnbe loc~ned in wesHcn- 10 mcorpomtc and rtjuvenme the use from the conference and highlights of tml New Mexico fomted the Zuni of traditional technologies and prac- the discussions will be published in a Conscrvntlon Pl\)jcct in 199 1 to serve as lices into nnturnl resource use plan· special Spring 1995 issue of the Sr. th~ir dcl):'rCmem of n:uurnl resources. ning. Thomas l.aw Re••fcw. The Zuni communuy has approximately By the end of 1993. the Zuni 9,000 pe-ople. In 1990, p.15Sag< of the Conse"•auon Pro.JC(t completed a plan For mot< lnformattoto: the Zuni Conservauon Act enabled of acuon fe>< sustaonablc development Pnlf"'-"'' Slrtfru:d ll'f<»tt<r. Clwlr. Sutnng l>unchlng of 1hc project The Act was -the Zuno ~rce o.:,·elopment Plan. Commlll« Tribal Sowr<~g~~ly S)Oijli>Wm. J>35$d to cnd Ol.'lny >~rs of litiW~tion This pbn follows the forn~11 of the UN'S S<. ThDrnM UnM"'IJI S<looal cf l.a"' >g>lnst the US Go\'cmment for damage Ag.onda 21 doeumem. tn se1ung gu1dc- 16-ICO N IV J2nd "'~ Mwmt, fl<>nd<J JJOSi. to Zum l•ncb ond f10m mismanag.omem hnes. goals. and .lCioon obJCcti\'CS for Td; (lOS) 62J.2JOS, FGX. (lOS) 62J-2.J90 I T 16 Sl7 moUton trust fund to set up a system of bnd management to rehobilit;ue nnd conserve Zums land and natu.ml resources. Also Included In the Act ore T � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Expanding Indigenous Journalism in Central America Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Expanding Indigenous Journalism in Central America Item Type Journal Article Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 36 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note Central American indigenous leaders met in El Salvador to discuss plans to boost Indian news media in the region. Attachment Title Expanding_indigenous_journalism_in_central_america.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Central America Indigenous journalism International Indigenous Decade https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/5e4bfa92a1d45d2eba6f35ce47858f9a.pdf 9da88db5d6c711b92795f4f09fb9a0c9 PDF Text Text INTERNAT I ONAL Free-determination and the States: Commentary on Barbados Ill by A ucan H uilcaman read with interest the "Declaration of Barbados Ill" reprinted in the last issue o f Abya Y News (Voi:S no.3). ala Considering the breadth of material included in the declaration. I will only comment on the portion of that docu· I ment which begins with suggestions to the governing l.1tin America.n states, the United Nations and its various specific bodies such as the OIT, UNESCO. UNDP. and FMI. Second. I also want 10 comment on the declarationS final sec· The promises which L'ltin America:S governing states have made through documents in summits such as those held in Mexico and Spain respond 10 Indigenous peoples· undeniable reality, but these resolutions are very far from being implemented in practice. In the meeting in Spain, the governments promised to establish a Development Fund for Indigenous Peoples of latin America and the Caribbean. Now, when \ Ve are in agreement in relation to Indigenous peoples petition the fund for economic assis1ance. they are told that the fund has no resources and that it is only a negotiating table between some international organizations and the identification and historical analysis of factors wh ich have made the political and cultural oppression of Indigenous peoples possible. as well as the ' "e'vs on ideological, political. religious. and eco- legitimize their actions, they have established an an oversight council with Indigenous representation. However, Indigenous delegates have to be ac redit~ tion related to the self.detemlination of Indigenous peoples and the nationally constituted states. nomic colonialism and neocolonialism. However. the declarations call to the Latin American governing states seems misplaced. The Slates are fully aware of the reality in which we Indigenous peo· pies live. Th ey know that this reality has been constructed by force and violence. The denial of our physical and cultural existence produced by the political constitutions and legal systems responds to the homogenizing nature of the govem- ing states, and is the resuh of organized political decisions. not of coincidence or circumstance. Aucan fhiilcaman is \Verken. or spohc..sperson, for the Mapuehe organitation Auhin \Vallmapu Ngulam-C<>uncll of All the Lands rn S<>ulhcm Chile. Vol. 8 No.4 Indigenous communities. In order to ted by each countrys chancellor. They this ·democratic panicipation." but il is nothing more than state colonialism under the guise of recognition and democracy. Similarly, the governing states came to a set of agreements at the Eanh Summit in Rio de janeiro in 1992. If we try to verify compliance with these agreements. we do n ot find any concrete means in the legal. political or eco· nomic arenas to ensure better adminis· tration of natural resources. It is easier to identify the thousands of hectares of land. mountains. rivers. and lakes which have been destroyed and contaminated. Un doubtedly. as it has become impossible 10 evade the Indigenous reality. the governing s.tates will make a declaration C.."lll regarding Indigenous peoples whenever they hold a continental meeting. but in no case does this imply compliance with their promises. I belie,·e that any demands or exhor· tations require precision. We Indigenous peoples are fighting for the recognition of our rights, rooted in our historical and political condition as a people. with all powers in the areas of rights, ideology. politics. and culture which this implies. such as the restilu· tion of fundamental rights and freedoms such as free·determination and the resti· nuion of ancestral lands. These condi· tions are precede any fonn of recognition. otherwise. the states will continue lO determine the framework for recogni· tion and relations between Indigenous peoples and the governing states. 1 consider out of context the cttll to the United Nations and its various spe· cial bodies. as if these were something separate from the constitution. control. and intervention of the governing states. ll is time to state what the United Nations is and what it truly represents. The United Nations does not exist; what truly exists are "Concerted States.. which are simply institutional structures whh a legal. political and ideological base and with defined interests. Taking into account that the ideological base and sustenance o£ a nation is fundamentally cultural. It is no longer possible to con· tend lhal the "states are polilically·orga· nized nations." States in America (Wallmapu in the Mapuche language) have no corresponding socio-<:ultural reality. Therefore. the United Nations 23 �t< T E R t< AT I 0 t< A L arc the s.-~mt govemmg states that have been COI\SIIUCicd wnhou1 uking into account the cultur.ll d"·ersny of the con- unent The I LO (lnternouonal Labor Orgamzauon). UN Oe\'elopment Program ond UNICEF are not independent of the United Nations or of the governing s1mcs. Thus. their actions are not :lU10ttomous. All of their plans. progmms. nnd projects require govern· mental approval. It is sufficiem that an lndagcnous organization comes into confltct wtth the stotc in the process of then struggle, for these org:mizations to hmtt the help chey gwe. Relaung to 1he declarauonS State· ment, '"\Vt btheve u necessary to appro\'e the Chaner of Indigenous Peoples Raglns promoted by the UN: it 1S wonh menuontng that af1er thineen ye01rs of dtscussaon lxtween members of the UN Workeng Group and Indigenous reprcscnt:tllv<:s. the governments are not willing to recognize fundament:tl rights such ns frec-deurminacion and the restitution of nnccstml territories. Frcedctcrmmmlon is a right prior to. or condicional for. enJoynlCnt of the ocher rights. Before demanding prompc racificauon or thiS feg.1l instrument, it is esscnual to be sufficaently informed of the fundamental nghts chac lndagenous peoples are defendmg m che '"'rious spaces 3.\"31lablt to us, as well as posi· uons t3kcn by thr states in relation to chcsc nghts. Wuhouc mcorporacing these COnditiOnS, new ronns or dominaliOn could spnng from international law, even ash IS rr:1med as the recognition of Indigenous peoples and cheir righcs. Dunng che Working Groups' fino( session (July 25-29, 1994), they did not permit rc,•lsion of the declaration. and merely received Indigenous represencatives ·comments." chereby pre,·cnung full recogmuon of che confltcl becwcen lndtgcnous righcs and che states The nghc co free-<ltcerminacion, formulated by the Indigenous peoples. shows che d"•de between the historical 24 legacimocy of lndtgenous peoples" inahenable nghts and che legaluy that sustatns che staces The lnd1genous people ma1ntam wuh all our comiction that 1hc states, do not ha,•e more nghts than we do. nor have we au1horized them to 1m·oke our exclusi"c rights, nor intervene II' OUr I)COpltS' rulUre. Since the dcclarat•on olso calls on the lntcrnmionnl Lnbor Organiza1ion (ILO) and refers to its Covcnanc 169, I have to comment that this Covenant renects the st:ue-govcmments' politics of juridiClll colonialism as well as chat of the UN'$ agenc•es. Although che Co\'eMnt rccogmzes us as peoples. it samultaneously r<J<CIS che righcs chac stem rrom thiS r«OgJ'IIliOO, SO that it remams purely symbolic. The Co"enants most SlgntfiCllnc element lies in pro'"dmg lndagenous people che right to '"consultauon and panicipauon: Howe,·er. th1s ng.ht becomes ind· recuve when we remain polhica11y o ppressed by the scates. Indigenous consent In 1his context is rel:uive. At the UN World Conference on ~Iuman Rights in june of 1993 where I served as spokesperson for che Indigenous represemauvcs. we Slated "\Vc call on the States to mufy Co"enant 169 of the ILO pro,1dtd chat the Indigenous peoples are 1n agrt-c:ment \Ve understand this 1nstrumcnc as che first step co establish new and better relauons between the stales and chc lndtgenous peoples: In rdercnce to the international development and rinnndal organizations such ns the World llMk, IMF. lnteramer•can Oe,·elopmem Bank, it should be noccd chat che developmenc chey hove imposed is unilateral, and has assaulted Indigenous cuhuml identities and the economics of reciprocity. These are the snl'nc orgnnizntions that appro"ed projeccs for conscntccion of hydroeleccrac dams and ocher such endea,·ors wuhm lndtgenous territories. for example, chc hydroeltctric dams on the Rt\'er B1o-Bao \\ithm Pehuenche Mapuche lands. Any '"''ilation to change pohcaes made co chest institu- tions is \'Cry for from bemg mec, especially stnce chey respond co che tntere.sts of the gcn·emmencs ond are not independenc bod1es. The dedarauon ends refemng to che democmtizauon or Lattn America. of geopolhacal reorganizouon, and che rccogni1ion or the Indigenous territories. I reiterate that we arc in agreement on this: it continues. however, whh a call for recognition o f Indigenous righcs "'in a rramcwork or n sclr-dctermination compotible wlch, and complememary 10 the 50\'CI'Cigmy or national Slates.. 1am not sure af I should conclude chac in chis passage the dcdar.auon presencs a sec of contradacuons oorely compouble with the prev1ous am'llysas. or whether it is the poliucal onentauon of che Signatory Org.1111%3UOn. \VhaCe\'Cr the case, I \VIIl emphastze che 1mphcauons thts essen· cialaspecc has for posstble solucions and new rclationshtps between Indigenous peoples and states. It is incongruent co propose che compatlbilhy Indigenous sclf-dccermination and the sovereignty of the nationally constituted states. ItS worth reicerating 1ha1 Indigenous people are fighcing for fru dcl<rrninatlon and not self-determanauon. These concepcs ha,·e different meantngs and amphcations tn the legal, poltucal, 1deologacal, hisconcal. and culturol fields. lndagenous peoples h•,-e yet co determine whether we want to develop our· seh-es '"tthm or outstde of the SU\ICtures of che so-called nnuon-states. Funhcrmore. ns I poinced out above. nation-states don 1t extst. \\'hat exists are state-governments. The homogenizing and unilateral n:uure or the St:Ue•gOv· cmments is what maintains the lnck of cuhural understanding ond social incolerance. Complen>cncarhy wilh che Scaces as they are is imposstble. 11 will only be passable when both instiluuons recognize each other reciprocally under the baste pnnc1ple th:u neuher is more valid chan the othtr, and th3t eoch system of orgamzauon 1S the most adequace for ats own culture. ~aYalaN<M � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 8, no. 4 (Winter 1994) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Free-determination and the States: Commentary on Barbados III Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Aucan Huilcaman Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Winter 1994 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Free-determination and the States: Commentary on Barbados III Item Type Journal Article Author Aucan Huilcaman Volume 8 Issue 4 Pages 23-24 Publication Title SAIIC Newsletter ISSN 1071-3182 Date Winter 1994 Language English Abstract Note A spokesperson for the Mapuche organization Aukin Wallmapu Ngulam-Council of All the Lands comments of the "Declaration of Barbados III," especially the sections relating to the self-determination of Indigenous peoples and the nationally constituted states. Attachment Title Free_determination_and_the_states.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Autonomy Human Rights Indigenous Rights self-determination United Nations