1 12 2 https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/8bb5a8a736cd7f60ea7307ef4bf76832 1793d9364b36a37d764776b839e96afc Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 5, nos. 2 &3 (5-6).pdf PDF Text Text encuentran en la etapa exploratoria. a El gobierno del Presidente Rodrigo Borja otorgará nuevas concesiones a compañías petroleras que operan en la selva y en la costa del Ecuador. La explotación de petróleo en el Ecuador está controlada y supervisada por la Corporación Estatal Petro Ecuador. Aproximadamente 630.000 hectáreas de frágil bosque tropical y regiones de la costa están siendo explotadas por compañías petroleras. Aproximadamente 3.000.000 hectáreas más se Se espera que nuevas concesiones sean entregadas en una nueva ronda de licitaciones internacionales. Las nuevas concesiones del Oriente totalizarán más de 2.500.000 hectáreas e incluyen áreas del Territorio Indio Huaorani, asi como tierras del Parque Nacional Yasuni. Conoco, una compañía de Estados Unidos, una de las 20 compañías internacionales que acualmente operan en el Ecuador, está planeando la construcción de un carretera de 175 kilómetros de largo que servirá para permitir la construcción y el mantenimiento de un oleoducto. Este proyecto ha sido cuestionado por la fuerte oposición de organizaciones indias, (particularmente CONFENIAE) y ha sido criticado por numerosas organizaciones ambientalistas (ver Boletín de SAIIC, setiembre de �1989). La Fundación de Defensa Legal del Sierra Club de San Francisco, California, ha dado a conocer un informe de 39 páginas sobre la construcción de carreteras en el Parque Nacional Yasuni de Ecuador. El informe fue examinado con atención en la Sesión para la Prevencion de la Discriminación y Protección de las )\linorías de las Naciones Unidas en agosto del año pasado, en Ginebra, Suiza. El informe dice que "la ya severa reducción de la población Huaorani en el pasado, debido a actividades similares, está bien documentada y es una indicación de la amenaza del genocidio que ocurrirá si la carretera se construye o se produce otro tipo de invasiones .... Tanto Ecuador como Conoco, que son los responsables de la explotación petrolera en territorio Huaorani, son pasibles de ser acusados de genocidio ... " (pp 17-18). CORDAVI, una organización de defensa legal y derechos humanos del Ecuador, ha presentado un caso similar por la construcción de la carretera, alegando que" el gobierno ha violado la Constitución al permitir la construcción de la carretera y la explotación de recursos dentro de un área protegida." En mayo del año pasado, representantes del Gobierno Ecuatoriano, Petra Ecuador y el Instituto Ecuatoriano para la Reforma Agraria (IERAC) firmaron un acuerdo con representantes de CONFENIAE y la Organización Nacional de Pueblos Indios del Ecuador (CONAIE), en Sarayacu, una comunidad india de la Amazonía. Las autoridades se comprometieron a legalizar los Territorios Indios Huaorani, otorgándoles el status de áreas protegidas, así como también, a otros territorios indios, con la coordinación de CONFENIAE. También estuvieron de acuerdo en poner fin a la colonización de los territorios indios de la selva y de la costa y solicitar que el Instituto Linguístico de Verano se retire de los territotios indios. Hasta el día de hoy, estos acuerdos aún no han sido cumplidos por el gobierno. CONFENIAE informa que "la situación en la selva del Ecuador es, en el presente, extremadamente alarmente. De las aproximadamente once millones de hectáreas de selva, el35% está ocupado por plantaciones y otras explotaciones agroindustriales de propiedad privada. Solo el 15% ha sido declarado área de Parques Nacionales. En total, el 80% de la región es propiedad de compañías que se sabe han destruído la selva, aplicando un sistema de 'concesiones'. Por esta razón, nosotros, los indios nos estamos preparando para defender nuestro territorio y para preservar el ecosistema del Amazonas ... " � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 5, Nos. 2&3 (Fall 1989 & Winter 1990) (Spanish) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource El Gobierno Ecuatoriano Otorga Nuevas Concesiones a Companias Petroleras (Ecuador) Type The nature or genre of the resource Newspaper Article 2 & 3 Language A language of the resource English 2 & 3 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Setiembre 1989 - Marzo 1990 September 1989 - March 1990 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource 2 & 3 Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 2 & 3 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource 2 & 3 Description An account of the resource 2 & 3 Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource 2 & 3 Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context 2 & 3 Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 2 & 3 Relation A related resource 2 & 3 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource 2 & 3 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived 2 & 3 Subject The topic of the resource 2 & 3 Zotero Title El Gobierno Ecuatoriano Otorga Nuevas Concesiones a Companias Petroleras (Ecuador) 2 & 3 Item Type Newspaper Article 2 & 3 Attachment Title Vol. 5, nos. 2 &3 (5-6).pdf 2 & 3 Attachment URL [No URL] 2 & 3 Artist 2 & 3 Attorney Agent 2 & 3 Book Author 2 & 3 Cartographer 2 & 3 Cast Member 2 & 3 Commenter 2 & 3 Composer 2 & 3 Contributor 2 & 3 Cosponsor 2 & 3 Counsel 2 & 3 Director 2 & 3 Editor 2 & 3 Guest 2 & 3 Interviewee 2 & 3 Interviewer 2 & 3 Inventor 2 & 3 Performer 2 & 3 Podcaster 2 & 3 Presenter 2 & 3 Producer 2 & 3 Programmer 2 & 3 Recipient 2 & 3 Reviewed Author 2 & 3 Scriptwriter 2 & 3 Series Editor 2 & 3 Sponsor 2 & 3 Translator 2 & 3 Words By 2 & 3 Note 2 & 3 DOI 2 & 3 ISBN 2 & 3 ISSN 2 & 3 Access Date 2 & 3 Application Number 2 & 3 Archive 2 & 3 Archive Location 2 & 3 Artwork Medium 2 & 3 Artwork Size 2 & 3 Assignee 2 & 3 Audio File Type 2 & 3 Audio Recording Format 2 & 3 Bill Number 2 & 3 Blog Title 2 & 3 Book Title 2 & 3 Call Number 2 & 3 Case Name 2 & 3 Code 2 & 3 Code Number 2 & 3 Code Pages 2 & 3 Code Volume 2 & 3 Committee 2 & 3 Company 2 & 3 Conference Name 2 & 3 Country 2 & 3 Court 2 & 3 Date 2 & 3 Date Decided 2 & 3 Date Enacted 2 & 3 Dictionary Title 2 & 3 Distributor 2 & 3 Docket Number 2 & 3 Document Number 2 & 3 Edition 2 & 3 Encyclopedia Title 2 & 3 Episode Number 2 & 3 Extra 2 & 3 Filing Date 2 & 3 First Page 2 & 3 Forum Title 2 & 3 Genre 2 & 3 History 2 & 3 Institution 2 & 3 Interview Medium 2 & 3 Issue 2 & 3 Issue Date 2 & 3 Issuing Authority 2 & 3 Journal Abbreviation 2 & 3 Label 2 & 3 Language Spanish Legal Status 2 & 3 Legislative Body 2 & 3 Letter Type 2 & 3 Library Catalog 2 & 3 Manuscript Type 2 & 3 Map Type 2 & 3 Medium 2 & 3 Meeting Name 2 & 3 Name of Act 2 & 3 Network 2 & 3 Num Pages 2 & 3 Number 2 & 3 Number of Volumes 2 & 3 Patent Number 2 & 3 Place 2 & 3 Post Type 2 & 3 Presentation Type 2 & 3 Priority Numbers 2 & 3 Proceedings Title 2 & 3 Program Title 2 & 3 Programming Language 2 & 3 Public Law Number 2 & 3 Publication Title SAIIC Newsletter Publisher 2 & 3 References 2 & 3 Report Number 2 & 3 Report Type 2 & 3 Reporter 2 & 3 Reporter Volume 2 & 3 Rights 2 & 3 Running Time 2 & 3 Scale 2 & 3 Section 2 & 3 Series 2 & 3 Series Number 2 & 3 Series Text 2 & 3 Series Title 2 & 3 Session 2 & 3 Short Title 2 & 3 Studio 2 & 3 Subject 2 & 3 System 2 & 3 Thesis Type 2 & 3 University 2 & 3 URL 2 & 3 Version 2 & 3 Video Recording Format 2 & 3 Volume 5 Website Title 2 & 3 Website Type 2 & 3 Pages 5-6 Ecuador Fall 1989 Government Petroleum Petroleum companies Petroleum Extraction Winter 1990 https://www.abyayalanews.org/files/original/add98f826e7a473d0f4a370340419abb.pdf 4df323bd58bfabdb2ae3607b6c6017ce PDF Text Text ENV IHO:--.:ME:--.:T & DEVELOPMENT ecades of petroleum exploitation in people that !ive'there. In 1992,afferextrncting the Ecuadorian Amazon have bad a over one billion barrels of crude oil, Texaco devastating impact on tl\e region's Oed the country leaving behind 2,500,000 environment and its inhabitants. Among the acres of baneo rainforests, abandoned toxic Indigenous communities directly affected, materials, 17 million gallons of spilled petro· Qu.ichua, Cofan, Siona, Sccoya, Huaorani, !cum and 20 million gallons of toxic spillage and more rccently,Shuar, Achuarand Sbiviar. in the Amazon's rivers. The ecological damage has bad a profound a growing movement to organize against the effectuponthelndigcnooscomrnunitics.Asidc exploitation of oil conglomerates is Sleadily gaining momentum. Complex and volatile, from the disruption of traditional lifestyles the situation in the region is changing and and massive displacement, it has caused growing more critical as the Ecuadorian gov- severe health problems. According to differemrncntscckstocxpandthcconccssionsgiven ent studies done by Acci6n Eco1 6gica (Eco· to petro-chemical corporations and the logical Action), an Ecuadorian environmen· privatization of Pctroccuador tb.rough there- tal organization, and The Institute for Eco· form of the hydrocaroons law. These policies nomic and Social Rights (IESR}, skin dis· will, on the one hand, lead to an increased role cases, digestive and respiratory problems, for private companies in the Ecuadorian malnutrition, cb.ronic headaches and cancer Amazon while on tbeother, reduce tbe State's run rampant throughout the communities. A control over the exploitation of a delicate separatcstudy by the Canadian company HBT Agra, assessing the environmental impact of coosystem. Texaco's activities is to be presented to both TEXACO tbe Ecuadorian government and Texaco. The repon will not be published, however, and For twenty years, Texaco'soperations have both Indigenous and environmental groups decimated one of the world's mOSl biologi· are quCSlioning its validity as it neglects to cally diverse regions, wreaking havoc on the mention the indelible impact of Texaco's environment and the 300,000 Indigenous actions up:m 1he region's inhabitanlS. D VOl. 7 NO. 3&4 In response to the extensive damage Texaco has caused, a campaign to hold Texaco accountable bas been launched on an international scale. Presently, there is a world-wide boycott of its products with campaigns taking place in Denmark, Holland, and England. In addition, IWO lawsuits in the United States have been filed and anicles in The New York Times, Reu1ers News Agency , and New Yorker Magazine attest to tbe fact that this conflict bas fmally caught the eye of the international press. \1 \Xl"S Wbile the campaign against Texaco intensifies, the Nonh American petro-chemical company, Maxus, continues tOexpand expiO· ration of Block 16 wbicb includes pan of Yasuni National Park and Huaorani territories. Evenbefore beginningextraction, Maxus bad already caused a 900 barrel oil spill when a pipeline belonging to the Occidental Company was accidentally perforated by a Maxus work crew. Even though the spill was, fort be mOSl pan, contained, oil did manage to reach tbe estuaries of the Napo River. Moreover, tbe road tbat Maxus built to 19 �support itsoil extraction in Block 16bas ledto the colonization of the Tiputini River area. Through the purchase of wood for its encampments and extraction towers, it is promoting massive deforestation of the southern portion of the Cuyabeoo Reserve which was recently declared one of most biologically diverse regions in the world. The company is also responsible for several chemical spills in Ibis zone. As unbelievable as it may seem in the face of its disruptive practices, Maxus is attempting 10 present iiSCif as "protector" of the environment by promoting the establishment enous peoples of Pastaza, created social instability, and divisively manipulated and corrupted local individuals. Need I affirm that we find this tactic unethical and reprehensible?" Cuyabeno Reserve in Cofan tenritory, forcing the corporalion 10 negotiate with the Cofan community. The Cofans demanded active participation in Petroccuadot's activities on their tenritory and lbe financingof solar panels for their villages. A provisional accord was ...,!~---~· turned down by the corporate executives in , Quito who only agreed 10 the purchase of tbe solar panels valued at $10,000. The Cofans unanimously rejected tbeofferand stated that unless someone with sufficient authority agreed 10 their demands, they would be forced once again to shut down Pctroecuador's ex- L .. ploration activities. This conJlict was temporarily resolved when Petroecuador announced that no oil bad been found in Paujil. Nevertheless, there is evidence that suggests that Pctroccuador plans 10 perforate a few miles outside the reserve. of an environmental inves4igation srationand sponsoring an archeological project to "preserve Ibe cultures that have been occupying the region for thousands of years." ARCO I'ETROECUJlOR .-\\ll TilE I'E\IJI\G IIYDROC\RIIO\S L.\ \1 REFOR\1 Another petro-<:bemical corporation is ARCO, which hasuscddivisivetacticsamong Indigenous communities in Block 10 of the The future privatization of Petroccuador Pas1aza province. During a meeting with lead- has potentially devastating implications. If ers of the Organizationof Indigenous Peoples passed, the World Bank sponsored of Pastaza (OPIP), in Berkeley , California, privatization and reform of the Ecuadorian during the month of October, 1992, ARCO hydrocarbons law will sever the stale's ability agreed: 1) 10 rcspccllhe political and cultural 10 control and sanction oil corporations. The integrity of Indigenous peoples in Pastaza 2) new law would open up the region 10 innot enter into divisive negotiations through creased exploration and exploitation as well lhe buyingoffofloeal individuals; 3) todesist as grant new ooocessions to multinational from creating tensions which may lead 10 the corporntions, aecelernting the pace of demililaiization of the region; 4) 10 keep all struction even more. meeting allendces abreast of present and In response 10 the impending reforms, a future exploratory activity. Nevertheless, campaign bas been launcbed which seeks 10 ARCO has forgone this accord and launcbed minimize tbe impact on the region. The a campaign 10 politically debilitate OPIP. "Amazonia for Life" campaign is currently Through manipulation and bribery, ARCO pressuring the Wodd Bank toconsider its loan has created a parallel and independent organi- 10 the Ecuadorian government as a "Type A" zation, DICIP, and is unwil.ling 10 continue loan, calling for environmental and cultural lhe dialogue unless DICIP part icipatcs equally. impact reports prior to any further exploration Needless 10 say, OICJP unconditionally sup- in the region, as well as establishing a process ports ARCO's activities. In a rcccntlellct 10 of public participation that would include the ARCO's CEO, John Middleton, Hector affected Indigenous communities and repreVillamil, president of OPIP stales: 'To date, sentative organizations. ARCO bas neglected 10 comply with (the above)"guaranlccs and bas actively pursued a COFA\S CO\FRO\T strategy which systematically and insidiously PETROECL\DOR undennines the political integrity of OP!P. During the past months, ARCO has reinstated On October 2&, 40 Cofans took over a an un.eaJied for hostility toward the lndig· Petroccuador oil well located inside the 20 IILOCK 22 EXCLU>Eil FRO\ I 199~ CO\CESSIO\S In November, 1993, it was confirmed that Block 22, inside Yasuni National Park, would not be included in the concessions being offered for 1994. Th.is is undoubtedly due, at least in part, 10 pressures from the international and Ecuadorian environmental communities. However, the right of Indigenous peoples 10 control oil development on their lands still needs 10 be addressed. •••••••• The prolonged pctroleum extraction activities in the Ecuadorian Amazon has taken place without environmental or sociaJ impactS being taken into account. Important decisions have been made without consulting with the Indigenouscommunities who inevi- tably suffer the brunt of these deleterious activities. National parl(s, reserves and Indigenous tcnritories which bad supposedly been pern1anently designated as cultural and envi· ronmental reserves have not been spared. II is within this context, that the Public Enterprise Rcfonn, 10 fi6ECUPA103 in Category A, calling for an all-inclusive Study of social, environmental and cultural impacts of petroleumactivities, isbeingadvocated by various international and national Indigenous, environmental and social justice organizations. Sou.r«: RafofON:SI Action Nttwork Abya Y ala N e ws � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Vol. 7, nos. 3-4 (Fall/Winter 1993) Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Oil Companies Take Over the Ecuadorian Amazon Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Fall and Winter 1993 Language A language of the resource English English Zotero Title Oil Companies Take Over the Ecuadorian Amazon Item Type Journal Article Volume 7 Issue 3,4 Pages 19-20 Publication Title Abya Yala News: Journal of the South and Meso American Indian Rights Center (SAIIC) ISSN 1071-3182 Date Fall and Winter 1993 Language English Abstract Note Petroleum extraction by oil companies has caused extensive damage to the Ecuadorian Amazon and as a result local indigenous populations have suffered the most. Oil rights have changed control often in Ecuador, but policy makers have yet to address the environmental and social impacts caused by the oil extraction. Attachment Title Oil_Companies_Take_Over_The_Ecuadorian_Amazon.pdf Attachment URL [No URL] Amazon Cuyabeno Reserve ecological damage Ecuador Environmentalism Petroleum Extraction Texaco